Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23826558›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of laboratory medicine2013

Is prostate-specific antigen effective for population screening of prostate cancer? A systematic review.

Yoon Jae Lee, Ji Eun Park, Byung Ryul Jeon, Sang Moo Lee, Soo Young Kim, You Kyoung Lee

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. TheReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Potential Epigenetic Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Screening.International neurourology journal · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biomarkers in prostate cancer: what's new?Current opinion in oncology · 2014
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yoon Jae LeeDepartment of Health Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Eun Park
Byung Ryul Jeon
Sang Moo Lee
Soo Young Kim
You Kyoung Lee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for population screening has presented controversial results in large trials and prior reviews. We investigated the effectiveness of PSA population screening in a systematic review.

methodsThe study was conducted using existing systematic reviews. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane library, and the major Korean databases. The quality of the systematic reviews was assessed by two reviewers independently using AMSTAR. Randomized controlled trials were assessed using the risk of bias tool in the Cochrane group. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager. The level of evidence of each outcome was assessed using GRADE.

resultsProstate-cancer-specific mortality was not reduced based on similar prior reviews (relative risk [RR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.07, P=0.31). The detection rate of stage 1 prostate cancer was not greater, with a RR of 1.67 (95% CI, 0.95-2.94) and high heterogeneity. The detection rate of all cancer stages in the screening group was high, with a RR of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.13-1.85). No difference in all-cause mortality was observed between the screening and control groups (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01, P=0.50). Prostate-cancer-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and diagnosis of prostate cancer at stages 3-4 showed moderate levels of evidence.

conclusionsDifferently from prior studies, our review included updated Norrköping data and assessed the sole effect of PSA testing for prostate cancer screening. PSA screening alone did not increase early stage prostate cancer detection and did not lower mortality.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualHumansMaleMass ScreeningNeoplasm StagingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsProstate-Specific AntigenMass screeningMeta-analysisMortalityProstate specific antigenProstatic neoplasmReview

Identifiers

PMID23826558
PMCPMC3698300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.