Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23826411›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2013

Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas and their morphological mimics.

Hiroaki Kimura, Yoh Dobashi, Takayuki Nojima, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Norio Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya, Hiroko Ikeda, Seiko Sawada-Kitamura, Takeru Oyama, Akishi Ooi

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Droplet Digital PCR Assessment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. FISH Diagnostic Assessment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Molecular testing of soft tissue tumors.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. MDM2 Amplified Sarcomas: A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroaki KimuraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Yoh Dobashi
Takayuki Nojima
Hiroyuki Nakamura
Norio Yamamoto
Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Hiroko Ikeda
Seiko Sawada-Kitamura
Takeru Oyama
Akishi Ooi
Kanazawa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) and the de-differentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) represent the most common category of liposarcomas. ALT/WDLSs and DDLSs are often difficult to distinguish from other tumors with similar morphological characteristics. In this study, we investigated whether the detection of amplified or overexpressed murine double-minute 2 (MDM2) can be a useful diagnostic ancillary aid. We used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect MDM2 amplification and protein overexpression, respectively, in 49 WDLSs, 5 DDLSs, 23 myxoid liposarcomas, 25 benign lipomatous tumors, and 75 spindle and pleomorphic sarcomas. MDM2 amplification was detected in 48 of 49 WDLSs, 5 of 5 DDLSs, 2 of 9 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and 2 of 10 myxofibrosarcomas. We did not detect MDM2 amplification in any of the benign lipomatous tumors. FISH-mediated detection of MDM2 amplification was the most valuable diagnostic aid for ALT/WDLS, as determined by using the Fisher exact test to compare two different diagnoses of 19 biopsies. On the contrary, unequivocal nuclear overexpression of MDM2 was found in only 10 of 50 ALT/WDLSs. The sensitivity and specificity of MDM2 amplification in distinguishing a DDLS from spindle and pleomorphic sarcomas were 100% and 95%, respectively, while those of MDM2 overexpression were 100% and 87%, respectively. In conclusion, our results indicate that FISH-mediated detection of MDM2 amplification is the most useful adjunct in the diagnosis of both ALT/WDLS and DDLS. However, IHC-mediated detection of MDM2 protein is useful only for the diagnosis of DDLS.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCell DifferentiationChi-Square DistributionDiagnosis, DifferentialGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImmunohistochemistryLipomaLiposarcomaLiposarcoma, MyxoidPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Biomarkers, TumorMDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2FISHIHCLiposarcomaMDM2

Identifiers

PMID23826411
PMCPMC3693195
OpenAlexW2408106390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.