Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23826298›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Physiological function of gastrin-releasing peptide and neuromedin B receptors in regulating itch scratching behavior in the spinal cord of mice.

Devki D Sukhtankar, Mei-Chuan Ko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A neuropeptide code for itch.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effects of NOP-Related Ligands in Nonhuman Primates.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Devki D SukhtankarDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Mei-Chuan Ko
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Behavioral Pharmacology of ItchR01AR059193 · NIAMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KO, MEI-CHUAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Regulation of Itch Scratching by Spinal GRP Receptors in PrimatesR21AR064456 · NIAMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KO, MEI-CHUAN · 2013 to 2014
$359k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059193NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR-059193NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR064456NIAMS NIH HHS R21-AR-064456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pruritus (itch) is a severe side effect associated with the use of drugs as well as hepatic and hematological disorders. Previous studies in rodents suggest that bombesin receptor subtypes i.e. receptors for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRPr) and neuromedin B (NMBr) differentially regulate itch scratching. However, to what degree spinal GRPr and NMBr regulate scratching evoked by intrathecally administered bombesin-related peptides is not known. The first aim of this study was to pharmacologically compare the dose-response curves for scratching induced by intrathecally administered bombesin-related peptides versus morphine, which is known to elicit itch in humans. The second aim was to determine if spinal GRPr and NMBr selectively or generally mediate scratching behavior. Mice received intrathecal injection of bombesin (0.01-0.3 nmol), GRP (0.01-0.3 nmol), NMB (0.1-1 nmol) or morphine (0.3-3 nmol) and were observed for one hour for scratching activity. Bombesin elicited most profound scratching over one hour followed by GRP and NMB, whereas morphine failed to evoke scratching response indicating the insensitivity of mouse models to intrathecal opioid-induced itch. Intrathecal pretreatment with GRPr antagonist RC-3095 (0.03-0.1 nmol) produced a parallel rightward shift in the dose response curve of GRP-induced scratching but not NMB-induced scratching. Similarly, PD168368 (1-3 nmol) only attenuated NMB but not GRP-induced scratching. Individual or co-administration of RC-3095 and PD168368 failed to alter bombesin-evoked scratching. A higher dose of RC-3095 (0.3 nmol) generally suppressed scratching induced by all three peptides but also compromised motor function in the rotarod test. Together, these data indicate that spinal GRPr and NMBr independently drive itch neurotransmission in mice and may not mediate bombesin-induced scratching. GRPr antagonists at functionally receptor-selective doses only block spinal GRP-elicited scratching but the suppression of scratching at higher doses is confounded by motor impairment.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsBombesinGastrin-Releasing PeptideIndolesInjections, SpinalMaleMiceMorphineMotor ActivityPeptide FragmentsPruritusPyridinesReceptors, BombesinSpinal CordBombesinbombesin (6-14), Tpi(6)-Leu(13)-psi(CH2NH)-Leu(14)-Gastrin-Releasing PeptideIndolesMorphinePD 168368Peptide FragmentsPyridinesReceptors, Bombesin

Identifiers

PMID23826298
PMCPMC3691251
OpenAlexW2090324990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.