Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23826173›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Genomer--a Swiss army knife for genome scaffolding.

Michael D Barton, Hazel A Barton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael D BartonBiology Department, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States of America. mail@michaelbarton.me.uk
Hazel A Barton

Funding

ZEBRAFISH VISUAL FUNCTION RECOVERY FOLLOWING OPTIC NERVE DAMAGEP20RR016481 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BARTON, HAZEL A · 2001 to 2011
$34.8M
Microbial metabolic mutualism in starved environments.R15GM079775 · NIGMS · NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY · PI BARTON, HAZEL A · 2008 to 2008
$197k
NCRR NIH HHS 2P20 RR016481-09NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016481NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM079775NIGMS NIH HHS R15GM079775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing accessibility and reduced costs of sequencing has made genome analysis accessible to more and more researchers. Yet there remains a steep learning curve in the subsequent computational steps required to process raw reads into a database-deposited genome sequence. Here we describe "Genomer," a tool to simplify the manual tasks of finishing and uploading a genome sequence to a database. Genomer can format a genome scaffold into the common files required for submission to GenBank. This software also simplifies updating a genome scaffold by allowing a human-readable YAML format file to be edited instead of large sequence files. Genomer is written as a command line tool and is an effort to make the manual process of genome scaffolding more robust and reproducible. Extensive documentation and video tutorials are available at http://next.gs.

Indexed as

SoftwareBase SequenceComputational BiologyGenome, HumanHumansMolecular Sequence Annotation

Identifiers

PMID23826173
PMCPMC3691230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.