Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23825918›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2013

Evaluation of the percentage of ganglion cells in the ganglion cell layer of the rodent retina.

Cassandra L Schlamp, Angela D Montgomery, Caitlin E Mac Nair, Claudia Schuart, Daniel J Willmer, Robert W Nickells

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The RBPMSiScience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. InducibleCells · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Colour and melanopsin mediated responses in the murine retina.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cassandra L SchlampDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Angela D Montgomery
Caitlin E Mac Nair
Claudia Schuart
Daniel J Willmer
Robert W Nickells
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW Vision Research Core - Administrative CoreP30EY016665 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROBERT W NICKELLS · 2005 to 2026
$12.6M
The molecular mechanism of retinal ganglion cell deathR01EY012223 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NICKELLS, ROBERT W · 2005 to 2017
$6.3M
Characterization of RGC death susceptibility allelesR01EY018869 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NICKELLS, ROBERT W · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY016665NEI NIH HHS P30EY016665NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012223NEI NIH HHS R01EY012223NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018869NEI NIH HHS R01EY018869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRetinal ganglion cells comprise a percentage of the neurons actually residing in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) of the rodent retina. This estimate is useful to extrapolate ganglion cell loss in models of optic nerve disease, but the values reported in the literature are highly variable depending on the methods used to obtain them.

methodsWe tested three retrograde labeling methods and two immunostaining methods to calculate ganglion cell number in the mouse retina (C57BL/6). Additionally, a double-stain retrograde staining method was used to label rats (Long-Evans). The number of total neurons was estimated using a nuclear stain and selecting for nuclei that met specific criteria. Cholinergic amacrine cells were identified using transgenic mice expressing Tomato fluorescent protein. Total neurons and total ganglion cell numbers were measured in microscopic fields of 10(4) µm(2) to determine the percentage of neurons comprising ganglion cells in each field.

resultsHistorical estimates of the percentage of ganglion cells in the mouse GCL range from 36.1% to 67.5% depending on the method used. Experimentally, retrograde labeling methods yielded a combined estimate of 50.3% in mice. A retrograde method also yielded a value of 50.21% for rat retinas. Immunolabeling estimates were higher at 64.8%. Immunolabeling may introduce overestimates, however, with non-specific labeling effects, or ectopic expression of antigens in neurons other than ganglion cells.

conclusionsSince immunolabeling methods may overestimate ganglion cell numbers, we conclude that 50%, which is consistently derived from retrograde labeling methods, is a reliable estimate of the ganglion cells in the neuronal population of the GCL.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CountFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsRats, Long-EvansRetinal Ganglion CellsStaining and Labeling

Identifiers

PMID23825918
PMCPMC3695759
OpenAlexW2119765340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.