Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23825881›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2013

Using TRIPS flexibilities to facilitate access to medicines.

Dianne Nicol, Olasupo Owoeye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trade, intellectual property, and the public health bearing.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2023
    Article
  3. Primary health care and sustainable development goals.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dianne NicolUniversity of Tasmania, Faculty of Law, Private Bag 89, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. dianne.nicol@utas.edu.au
Olasupo Owoeye

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The problem of how to mitigate the impact of pharmaceutical patents on the delivery of essential medicines to the world's poor is as far from being resolved as it has ever been. Extensive academic commentary and policy debate have achieved little in terms of practical outcomes. Although international instruments are now in place allowing countries to enact legislation that permits the generic manufacture of patented pharmaceuticals, many countries have not yet enacted appropriate legislation and most of those that have yet to make use of it. One major problem is that the requirements of international instruments and implementing legislation are seen as being so stringent as to be unworkable. This paper calls for fresh attempts to enact workable legislation that fits within the prescribed requirements of international law without going beyond them. It argues that high-income nations should refocus on their moral obligation to enact appropriate legislative mechanisms and provide appropriate incentives for their use. Draft legislation currently being considered in Australia is used to illustrate how workable legislative frameworks can be developed.

Indexed as

PovertyAustraliaGlobal HealthHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPatents as TopicPharmaceutical PreparationsPolicy MakingPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID23825881
PMCPMC3699798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.