Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23825054›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2013

Translation of CGA codon repeats in yeast involves quality control components and ribosomal protein L1.

Daniel P Letzring, Andrew S Wolf, Christina E Brule, Elizabeth J Grayhack

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ADATs: roles in tRNA editing and relevance to disease.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emerging Role of GCN1 in Disease and Homeostasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. A ubiquitin language communicates ribosomal distress.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel P LetzringDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester Medical School, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Andrew S Wolf
Christina E Brule
Elizabeth J Grayhack
University of Rochester · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Training in Cellular, Biochemical and Molecular SciencesT32GM068411 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MAQUAT, LYNNE E · 2005 to 2019
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM068411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translation of CGA codon repeats in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is inefficient, resulting in dose-dependent reduction in expression and in production of an mRNA cleavage product, indicative of a stalled ribosome. Here, we use genetics and translation inhibitors to understand how ribosomes respond to CGA repeats. We find that CGA codon repeats result in a truncated polypeptide that is targeted for degradation by Ltn1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase involved in nonstop decay, although deletion of LTN1 does not improve expression downstream from CGA repeats. Expression downstream from CGA codons at residue 318, but not at residue 4, is improved by deletion of either ASC1 or HEL2, previously implicated in inhibition of translation by polybasic sequences. Thus, translation of CGA repeats likely causes ribosomes to stall and exploits known quality control systems. Expression downstream from CGA repeats at amino acid 4 is improved by paromomycin, an aminoglycoside that relaxes decoding specificity. Paromomycin has no effect if native tRNA(Arg(ICG)) is highly expressed, consistent with the idea that failure to efficiently decode CGA codons might occur in part due to rejection of the cognate tRNA(Arg(ICG)). Furthermore, expression downstream from CGA repeats is improved by inactivation of RPL1B, one of two genes encoding the universally conserved ribosomal protein L1. The effects of rpl1b-Δ and of either paromomycin or tRNA(Arg(ICG)) on CGA decoding are additive, suggesting that the rpl1b-Δ mutant suppresses CGA inhibition by means other than increased acceptance of tRNA(Arg(ICG)). Thus, inefficient decoding of CGA likely involves at least two independent defects in translation.

Indexed as

CodonParomomycinProtein BiosynthesisRibosomal ProteinsRibosomesRNA, FungalRNA, MessengerRNA, TransferSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCodonParomomycinribosomal protein L1Ribosomal ProteinsRNA, FungalRNA, MessengerRNA, TransferSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinscodonsgenetic coderibosometranslationubiquitinyeast

Identifiers

PMID23825054
PMCPMC3753928
OpenAlexW2112220686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.