Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23824516›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2013

Cell-based therapy for the deficient urinary sphincter.

Melanie L Hart, Katharina M H Neumayer, Martin Vaegler, Lisa Daum, Bastian Amend, Karl D Sievert, Simone Di Giovanni, Udo Kraushaar, Elke Guenther, Arnulf Stenzl and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie L HartKFO273, Department of Urology, UKT, University of Tuebingen, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 15, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Katharina M H Neumayer
Martin Vaegler
Lisa Daum
Bastian Amend
Karl D Sievert
Simone Di Giovanni
Udo Kraushaar
Elke Guenther
Arnulf Stenzl
Wilhelm K Aicher
University of Tübingen · DENatural and Medical Sciences Institute · DEHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When sterile culture techniques of mammalian cells first became state of the art, there was tremendous anticipation that such cells could be eventually applied for therapeutic purposes. The discovery of adult human stem or progenitor cells further motivated scientists to pursue research in cell-based therapies. Although evidence from animal studies suggests that application of cells yields measurable benefits, in urology and many other disciplines, progenitor-cell-based therapies are not yet routinely clinically available. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a condition affecting a large number of patients. The etiology of SUI includes, but is not limited to, degeneration of the urinary sphincter muscle tissue and loss of innervation, as well as anatomical and biomechanical causes. Therefore, different regimens were developed to treat SUI. However, at present, a curative functional treatment is not at hand. A progenitor-cell-based therapy that can tackle the etiology of incontinence, rather than the consequences, is a promising strategy. Therefore, several research teams have intensified their efforts to develop such a therapy for incontinence. Here, we introduce candidate stem and progenitor cells suitable for SUI treatment, show how the functional homogeneity and state of maturity of differentiated cells crucial for proper tissue integration can be assessed electrophysiologically prior to their clinical application, and discuss the trophic potential of adult mesenchymal stromal (or stem) cells in regeneration of neuronal function.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansStem Cell TransplantationTreatment OutcomeUrinary BladderUrinary Incontinence, StressUrination

Identifiers

PMID23824516
OpenAlexW2002796230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.