Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23824401›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2014

Health numeracy: the importance of domain in assessing numeracy.

Helen Levy, Peter A Ubel, Amanda J Dillard, David R Weir, Angela Fagerlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The Modest Effects of Fact Boxes on Cancer Screening.Journal of risk and uncertainty · 2021
    Article
  5. Understanding Health Risk Comprehension: The Role of Math Anxiety, Subjective Numeracy, and Objective Numeracy.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing the Demand for Micropensions among India's Poor.Journal of the economics of ageing · 2017
    Article
  9. Should Health Numeracy Be Assessed Objectively or Subjectively?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Future of family medicine: role of patient-centred care and evidence-based medicine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helen LevySurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (HL, DRW).
Peter A UbelFuqua School of Business, Sanford School of Public Policy, and School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (PAU)
Amanda J DillardDepartment of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI (AJD)
David R WeirSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (HL, DRW).
Angela FagerlinVA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI (AF)

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
Population Studies Center Infrastructure GrantR24HD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMOCK, PAMELA J. · 2001 to 2016
$13.2M
Health Literacy and Health Disparities Among the ElderlyK01AG034232 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LEVY, HELEN G · 2010 to 2015
$541k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG034232NIA NIH HHS K01AG034232NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740NIA NIH HHS U01AG009740NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveExisting research concludes that measures of general numeracy can be used to predict individuals' ability to assess health risks. We posit that the domain in which questions are posed affects the ability to perform mathematical tasks, raising the possibility of a separate construct of "health numeracy" that is distinct from general numeracy. The objective was to determine whether older adults' ability to perform simple math depends on domain.

methodsCommunity-based participants completed 4 math questions posed in 3 different domains: a health domain, a financial domain, and a pure math domain. Participants were 962 individuals aged 55 and older, representative of the community-dwelling US population over age 54.

resultsWe found that respondents performed significantly worse when questions were posed in the health domain (54% correct) than in either the pure math domain (66% correct) or the financial domain (63% correct). Our experimental measure of numeracy consisted of only 4 questions, and it is possible that the apparent effect of domain is specific to the mathematical tasks that these questions require.

conclusionsThese results suggest that health numeracy is strongly related to general numeracy but that the 2 constructs may not be the same. Further research is needed into how different aspects of general numeracy and health numeracy translate into actual medical decisions.

Indexed as

MathematicsSelf EfficacyAgedHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTask Performance and Analysiscognitionhealth literacyhealth numeracy

Identifiers

PMID23824401
PMCPMC4106034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.