Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23824107›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2013

Counseling cancer patients on complementary and alternative medicine. Background, theory, and implementation of nationwide counseling facilities.

J Hübner, K Muenstedt, R Muecke, O Micke, C Stoll, U R Kleeberg, J Buentzel, G Dennert, F J Prott, PRIO (Working group Prevention and Integrative Oncology of the German Cancer Society) and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Complementary medicine in uro-oncology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Complementary medicine in radiation oncology : German health care professionals' current qualifications and therapeutic methods.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Complementary and alternative medicine in radiation oncology : Survey of patients' attitudes.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A lecture program on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer patients--evaluation of the pilot phase.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

J HübnerDr. Senckenberg Chronomedical Institute, J.W. Goethe University, Theodor-Stern- Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. huebner@med.uni-frankfurt.de
K Muenstedt
R Muecke
O Micke
C Stoll
U R Kleeberg
J Buentzel
G Dennert
F J Prott
PRIO (Working group Prevention and Integrative Oncology of the German Cancer Society)
AKTE (Working group Trace Elements of the German Society of Radiooncology (DEGRO))

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is of high relevance in oncology. Only a minority of professionals feel competent in CAM. Our aim was to provide a strategy for establishing evidence-based counseling on CAM in oncology in the German health system.

methodsWe performed a systematic search of the literature on patient counseling concerning CAM. Of 811 articles identified in this search 51 met our inclusion criteria. Data from these articles were analyzed and adapted to the needs of German patients by a group of experts of the DEGRO ("Deutschen Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie") and the German Cancer Society. In the next step a strategy about how to integrate evidence-based counseling on CAM at cancer centers and oncological institutions was developed.

resultsFirst, evidence-based recommendations on CAM counseling were derived. The core of our strategy combines two levels of information provision: level 1 will be oncologists, radiotherapists and other specialists and level 2 oncological CAM experts. The latter group will serve as trainers and backup for complicated or advanced questions and for individual counseling of patients with complex needs. Professionals in level 1 will be offered special training.

conclusionEvidence-based counseling on CAM is not only possible but also mandatory in order to meet patient information needs. Our proposal would allow for integrated counseling available at all oncological institutions and guarantee a high quality. Furthermore, provision of information on two different levels allows the effective use of resources (manpower and financing).

Indexed as

Models, OrganizationalComplementary TherapiesDelivery of Health CareDirective CounselingGermanyHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.