Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23824106›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2013

Reirradiation for recurrent malignant brain tumor with radiotherapy or proton beam therapy. Technical considerations based on experience at a single institution.

M Mizumoto, T Okumura, E Ishikawa, T Yamamoto, S Takano, A Matsumura, Y Oshiro, H Ishikawa, H Sakurai, K Tsuboi

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Active raster scanning with carbon ions: reirradiation in patients with recurrent skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2014
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SERPINH1 and CTSZ are Key Markers of Glioma Angiogenesis.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Methyl-Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of carbon ion and photon reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Re-irradiation of recurrent glioblastoma as part of a sequential multimodality treatment concept.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acquired temozolomide resistance in human glioblastoma cell line U251 is caused by mismatch repair deficiency and can be overcome by lomustine.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M MizumotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
T Okumura
E Ishikawa
T Yamamoto
S Takano
A Matsumura
Y Oshiro
H Ishikawa
H Sakurai
K Tsuboi
University of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRadiotherapy for recurrent malignant brain tumors is usually limited because of the dose tolerance of the normal brain tissue. The goal of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of reirradiation for patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe subjects comprised 26 patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors treated with conventional radiotherapy (RT, n = 8), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT, n = 10), and proton beam therapy (PBT, n = 8) at our institute. Fifteen patients had glioblastoma, 6 had WHO grade 3 glioma, and 5 had other tumors. The dose of initial radiotherapy was 34.5-94.4 Gy. Different radiation schedules were compared using the equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions.

resultsReirradiation was completed in all patients without a severe acute reaction. The reirradiation doses were 30-60 Gy (median, 42.3 Gy) and the total doses for the initial and second treatments were 64.5-150.4 Gy (median, 100.0 Gy). Currently, 11 patients are alive (median follow-up period, 19.4 months) and 15 are dead. The median survival and local control periods after reirradiation of the 26 patients were 18.3 and 9.3 months, respectively. For the 15 patients with glioblastoma, these periods were 13.1 and 11.0 months, respectively. Two patients showed radiation necrosis that was treated by surgery or conservative therapy.

conclusionReirradiation for recurrent malignant brain tumor using conventional RT, SRT, or PBT was feasible and effective in selected cases. Further investigation is needed for treatment optimization for a given patient and tumor condition.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProtonsProton TherapyRadiotherapy, ConformalTreatment OutcomeProtons

Identifiers

PMID23824106
OpenAlexW1453429483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.