Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23824104›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2013

Feasibility of 6-month maintenance cetuximab after adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation plus cetuximab in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

C Matuschek, E Bölke, C Belka, U Ganswindt, M Henke, P Stegmaier, M Bamberg, S Welz, J Debus, A Gioules and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Radiation recall dermatitis after docetaxel chemotherapy. Treatment by antioxidant ointment.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2014
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

C MatuschekMedical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
E Bölke
C Belka
U Ganswindt
M Henke
P Stegmaier
M Bamberg
S Welz
J Debus
A Gioules
A Voigt
G Volk
C Ohmann
T Wiegel
V Budach
M Stuschke
J Schipper
P A Gerber
W Budach
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEJena University Hospital · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEEssen University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClose resection margins < 5 mm (CM) or extra capsular extent at the lymph nodes (ECE) impair the prognosis of patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) scheduled for adjuvant radiochemotherapy. We conducted a multicenter phase II study to investigate toxicity and efficacy of additional cetuximab administered concomitantly and as maintenance for the duration of 6 months following adjuvant radiochemotherapy., Ppreliminary results on feasibility and acute toxicity on skin and mucosa are presented in this article.

methodsPatients with SCCHN following CM resection or with ECE were eligible for the study. In all, 61.6 Gy (1.8/2.0/2.2 Gy, days 1-36) were administered using an integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique. Cisplatin (20 mg/m(2), days 1-5 and days 29-33) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as continuous infusion (600 mg/m(2), days 1-5 + days 29-33) were given concurrently. Cetuximab was started 7 days prior to radiochemotherapy at 400 mg/m(2) followed by weekly doses of 250 mg/m(2). Maintenance cetuximab began after radiochemotherapy at 500 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks for 6 months.

resultsOf the 55 patients (46 male, 9 female, mean age 55.6, range 29-70 years) who finished radiochemotherapy, 50 were evaluable for acute toxicity concerning grade III/IV toxicities of skin and mucosa. Grade 3-4 (CTC 3.0) mucositis, radiation dermatitis, and skin reactions outside the radiation portals were documented for 46, 28, and 14 % of patients, respectively. One toxic death occurred (peritonitis at day 57). Cetuximab was terminated in 5 patients due to allergic reactions after the first application. In addition, 22 % of patients discontinued cetuximab within the last 2 weeks or at the end of radiochemotherapy. Of patients embarking on maintenance treatment, 80 % were still on cetuximab at 3 months and 63 % at 5 months. Concurrent and maintenance treatment with cetuximab could be administered as scheduled in 48 % of patients.

conclusionAdjuvant radiochemotherapy with concomitant and maintenance cetuximab is feasible and acute toxicities are within the expected range. Compliance within the first 3-5 months is moderate.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabChemoradiotherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleMiddle AgedRadiation InjuriesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCetuximab

Identifiers

PMID23824104
OpenAlexW8337555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.