ArticlePloS one2013
The Predictive Nature of Pseudoneglect for Visual Neglect: Evidence from Parietal Theta Burst Stimulation.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Meta-analysis shows a malleable rightward bias in the expectations of objects in space.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Cognitive Effects Following Offline High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (HF-rTMS) in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2024Pooled it
- Causal involvement of the left angular gyrus in higher functions as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review.Brain structure & function · 2023Pooled it
- A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum?Cognitive processing · 2015Pooled it
- Article
- Reducing alertness does not affect line bisection bias in neurotypical participants.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Offline Parietal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation or Alpha Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Has No Effect on Visuospatial or Temporal Attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Ever-ready for action: Spatial effects on motor system excitability.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2020Article
- Right hemisphere occipital rTMS impairs working memory in visualizers but not in verbalizers.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Mapping visuospatial attention: the greyscales task in combination with repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.BMC neuroscience · 2018Article
- Inconsistent Effects of Parietal α-tACS on Pseudoneglect across Two Experiments: A Failed Internal Replication.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Article
- Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.Experimental brain research · 2014Article
- Representational pseudoneglect: a review.Neuropsychology review · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following parietal damage most patients with visual neglect bisect horizontal lines significantly away from the true centre. Neurologically intact individuals also misbisect lines; a phenomenon referred to as 'pseudoneglect'. In this study we examined the relationship between neglect and pseudoneglect by testing how patterns of pre-existing visuospatial asymmetry predict asymmetry caused by parietal interference. Twenty-four participants completed line bisection and Landmark tasks before receiving continuous theta burst stimulation to the left or right angular gyrus. Results showed that a pre-existing pattern of left pseudoneglect (i.e. right bias), but not right pseudoneglect, predicts left neglect-like behaviour during line bisection following right parietal cTBS. This correlation is consistent with the view that neglect and pseudoneglect arise via a common or linked neural mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.