Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23823974›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2013

Understanding patient portal use: implications for medication management.

Chandra Y Osborn, Lindsay Satterwhite Mayberry, Kenneth A Wallston, Kevin B Johnson, Tom A Elasy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Improving HbATelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Virtual Waiting Room: The New Narrative of Waiting in Oncology Care.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Use of the patient portal among older adults with diagnosed dementia and their care partners.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Observational

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chandra Y OsbornDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-8300, United States. chandra.osborn@vanderbilt.edu
Lindsay Satterwhite Mayberry
Kenneth A Wallston
Kevin B Johnson
Tom A Elasy

Funding

Vanderbilt Diabetes Research CenterP30DK020593 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ALVIN C POWERS · 2012 to 2026
$29.3M
TRANSGENIC MOUSE/ ES CELL SHARES RESOURCESP60DK020593 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI POWERS, ALVIN C · 1986 to 2011
$28.1M
Vanderbilt Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092986 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELASY, TOM A · 2011 to 2020
$6.7M
Vanderbilt Health Services Research Training ProgramT32HS013833 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFIN, MARIE R. · 2003 to 2012
$1.8M
Leveraging Patient Portals to Improve Medication Adherence in Type 2 DiabetesK01DK087894 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI OSBORN, CHANDRA Y. · 2011 to 2015
$710k
Identifying Areas for Family Intervention to Improve Adult Diabetes Self-CareF32DK097880 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MAYBERRY, LINDSAY S. · 2012 to 2014
$87k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS013833NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK097880NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK087894NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020593NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092986NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020593PHS HHS R 18 HSO18168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Internet can be leveraged to provide disease management support, including medication adherence promotion that, when tailored, can effectively improve adherence to medications. The growing adoption of patient portals represents an opportunity to support medication management and adherence more broadly, but virtually no data exist about the real and potential impact of existing portals on these outcomes.

objectiveWe sought to (1) understand who uses an existing patient portal and reasons for use and nonuse, (2) understand how portal users are using a portal to manage their medications, and (3) explore participants' ideas for improving portal functionality for medication management and adherence support.

methodsA total of 75 adults with type 2 diabetes participated in a mixed-methods study involving focus groups, a survey, and a medical chart review. We used quantitative data to identify differences between portal users and nonusers, and to test the relationship between the frequency of portal use and glycemic control among users. We used qualitative methods to understand how and why participants use a portal and their ideas for improving its medication management functionality.

resultsOf the enrolled participants, 81% (61/75) attended a focus group and/or completed a survey; portal users were more likely than nonusers to participate in that capacity (Fisher exact test; P=.01). Users were also more likely than nonusers to be Caucasian/white (Fisher exact test; P<.001), have higher incomes (Fisher exact test; P=.005), and be privately insured (Fisher exact test; P<.001). Users also tended to have more education than nonusers (Mann-Whitney U; P=.05), although this relationship was not significant at P<.05. Among users, more frequent use of a portal was associated with better A1C (Spearman rho =-0.30; P=.02). Reasons for nonuse included not knowing about the portal (n=3), not having access to a computer (n=3), or having a family member serve as an online delegate (n=1). Users reported using the portal to request prescription refills/reauthorizations and to view their medication list, and they were enthusiastic about the idea of added refill reminder functionality. They were also interested in added functionality that could streamline the refill/reauthorization process, alert providers to fill/refill nonadherence, and provide information about medication side effects and interactions.

conclusionsAlthough there are disparities in patient portal use, patients use portals to manage their medications, are enthusiastic about further leveraging portals to support medication management and adherence, and those who use a portal more frequently have better glycemic control. However, more features and functionality within a portal platform is needed to maximize medication management and adherence promotion.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementInternetPatient CompliancePatient ParticipationAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFocus GroupsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedHypoglycemic Agentscomputersdiabetes mellitushealth care disparitiesmedication adherencepatient portalpharmacy

Identifiers

PMID23823974
PMCPMC3713921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.