Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23823940›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Economic evaluation of Varicella vaccination: results of a systematic review.

Brigid Unim, Rosella Saulle, Sara Boccalini, Cristina Taddei, Vega Ceccherini, Antonio Boccia, Paolo Bonanni, Giuseppe La Torre

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Global impact of varicella vaccination programs.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  10. Varicella vaccination - the global experience.Expert review of vaccines · 2017
    Review
  11. Economic evaluations of vaccines in Canada: a scoping review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brigid UnimDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases; Sapienza University of Rome; Rome, Italy.
Rosella Saulle
Sara Boccalini
Cristina Taddei
Vega Ceccherini
Antonio Boccia
Paolo Bonanni
Giuseppe La Torre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of the present study is to review the economic burden of varicella disease and the benefit of universal varicella vaccination in different settings pending its implementation in all Italian regions. MATERIALS AND

methodsResearch was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and ISI databases. Score quality and data extraction were performed for all included studies.

resultsTwenty-three articles met the criteria: 15 cost-effectiveness, 8 cost-benefit and one cost-utility analysis. Varicella vaccination could save the society from €637,762 (infant strategy) to 53 million annually (combined infant and adolescent strategy). The median and the mean quality scores resulted in 91.8% and 85.4% respectively; 11 studies were considered of high quality and 12 of low quality. DISCUSSION: The studies are favorable to the introduction of universal varicella vaccination in Italy, being cost saving and having a positive impact on morbidity. The quality score of the studies varied greatly: recent analyses were of comparable quality to older studies.

Indexed as

ChickenpoxChickenpox VaccineCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansItalyVaccinationChickenpox Vaccinecost benefitcost effectivenesscost utilityeconomic evaluationvaccinationvaricella

Identifiers

PMID23823940
PMCPMC3906359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.