Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23823892›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2013

Linking Canadian population health data: maximizing the potential of cohort and administrative data.

Dany Doiron, Parminder Raina, Isabel Fortier, Linkage Between Cohorts and Health Care Utilization Data: Meeting of Canadian Stakeholders workshop participants

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Modern sources of controls in case-control studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A National Network of Safe Havens: Scottish Perspective.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Sharing administrative health data with private industry: A report on two citizens' juries.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. UK phenomics platform for developing and validating electronic health record phenotypes: CALIBER.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dany DoironPublic Population Project in Genomics and Society, Montreal, QC, Canada. ddoiron@p3g.org
Parminder Raina
Isabel Fortier
Linkage Between Cohorts and Health Care Utilization Data: Meeting of Canadian Stakeholders workshop participants

Funding

CIHR 114375-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linkage of data collected by large Canadian cohort studies with provincially managed administrative health databases can offer very interesting avenues for multidisciplinary and cost-effective health research in Canada. Successfully co-analyzing cohort data and administrative health data (AHD) can lead to research results capable of improving the health and well-being of Canadians and enhancing the delivery of health care services. However, such an endeavour will require strong coordination and long-term commitment between all stakeholders involved. The challenges and opportunities of a pan-Canadian cohort-to-AHD data linkage program have been considered by cohort study investigators and data custodians from each Canadian province. Stakeholders acknowledge the important public health benefits of establishing such a program and have established an action plan to move forward.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDatabases, FactualCanadaHumansMedical Record Linkagedata collectionMedical record linkagepublic health

Identifiers

PMID23823892
PMCPMC3880355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.