Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23823881›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2013

Contribution and performance of mobile units in an organized mammography screening program.

Anne-Maëlle Fontenoy, André Langlois, Sue-Ling Chang, Jean-Marc Daigle, Éric Pelletier, Marie-Hélène Guertin, Isabelle Théberge, Jacques Brisson

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Geographic variability in contemporary utilization of PET imaging for prostate cancer: a medicare claims cohort study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne-Maëlle FontenoyDirection de l’analyse et de l’évaluation des systèmes de soins et services, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.
André Langlois
Sue-Ling Chang
Jean-Marc Daigle
Éric Pelletier
Marie-Hélène Guertin
Isabelle Théberge
Jacques Brisson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this study were to evaluate the contribution of mobile mammography units to participation rate and to compare their performance to fixed screening centres within the organized mammography screening program of Quebec, Canada.

methodsThe study is based on all screening mammograms carried out in women aged 50-69 who participated in the Québec program from 2002 to 2010. Performance was measured by screening sensitivity, false-positive rate (1-specificity), positive likelihood ratio as well as abnormal call rate, detection rate, interval cancer rate, positive predictive value, and tumour characteristics. Poisson regression models with robust variance estimation were used to take into account the multi-level structure of the data. All models were adjusted for characteristics related to women.

resultsDuring the 2002-2010 period, 2,292,592 screening mammograms were performed, of which 42,279 (1.8%) were in mobile units. In regions serviced exclusively by mobile units, the participation rate reached an average of 63.4% during the 2006-2010 period compared to 54.7% for the entire study population. Estimated sensitivity was similar to that of fixed sites (rate ratio = 0.98 [0.84-1.15]) while the false-positive rate was lower (rate ratio = 0.76 [0.57-1.02]) although this difference was of marginal statistical significance (p=0.07).

conclusionsIn this program, mobile mammography units allowed regions lacking a fixed centre to attain participation rates slightly higher than those in the rest of Quebec, without loss of sensitivity and with some gain in the false-positive rate.

Indexed as

Mobile Health UnitsQuality Assurance, Health CareAgedBreast NeoplasmsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationQuebecSensitivity and SpecificityBreast neoplasmsmammographymass screeningmobile health unitsmobile mammography

Identifiers

PMID23823881
PMCPMC6974043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.