Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23823664›Full record

ReviewOrganogenesis

Electrical stimulation as a biomimicry tool for regulating muscle cell behavior.

Samad Ahadian, Serge Ostrovidov, Vahid Hosseini, Hirokazu Kaji, Murugan Ramalingam, Hojae Bae, Ali Khademhosseini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Organogenesis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MXene Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: Design and Translation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Graphene and TiACS applied bio materials · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A Tissue Engineering's Guide to Biomimicry.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Propagation of Dental and Respiratory Cells and Organs in Microgravity.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Minimally Invasive and Regenerative Therapeutics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samad AhadianWPI-Advanced Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Serge Ostrovidov
Vahid Hosseini
Hirokazu Kaji
Murugan Ramalingam
Hojae Bae
Ali Khademhosseini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing need to understand muscle cell behaviors and to engineer muscle tissues to replace defective tissues in the body. Despite a long history of the clinical use of electric fields for muscle tissues in vivo, electrical stimulation (ES) has recently gained significant attention as a powerful tool for regulating muscle cell behaviors in vitro. ES aims to mimic the electrical environment of electroactive muscle cells (e.g., cardiac or skeletal muscle cells) by helping to regulate cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions. As a result, it can be used to enhance the alignment and differentiation of skeletal or cardiac muscle cells and to aid in engineering of functional muscle tissues. Additionally, ES can be used to control and monitor force generation and electrophysiological activity of muscle tissues for bio-actuation and drug-screening applications in a simple, high-throughput, and reproducible manner. In this review paper, we briefly describe the importance of ES in regulating muscle cell behaviors in vitro, as well as the major challenges and prospective potential associated with ES in the context of muscle tissue engineering.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric StimulationHumansMuscle CellsTissue Engineeringalignmentbio-actuatorsdifferentiationdrug-screening modelsElectrical stimulationmuscle cellsmuscle tissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID23823664
PMCPMC3812291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.