Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23823071›Full record

ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2013

SIMIBI twins in protein targeting and localization.

Gert Bange, Irmgard Sinning

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structures of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeting of Proteins for Translocation at the Endoplasmic Reticulum.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The natural history of Get3-like chaperones.Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gert BangeBiochemie-Zentrum der Universität Heidelberg, INF328, Heidelberg, Germany. gert.bange@synmikro.uni-marburg.de
Irmgard Sinning

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signal recognition particle, MinD and BioD (SIMIBI)-type nucleoside triphosphate-binding proteins are an ancient subfamily of nucleotide-binding proteins that serve in a wide range of cellular processes. Notably, this class comprises dimeric ATPases as well as GTPases (SIMIBI 'twins') and a subset of SIMIBI-type proteins, including SRP GTPases, MinD-type ATPases and the Get3 ATPase, is essential to protein targeting and localization. Here, we define common mechanistic principles and differences for these SIMIBI proteins.

Indexed as

Protein MultimerizationProtein TransportAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacteriaCarrier ProteinsGTP PhosphohydrolasesModels, BiologicalModels, MolecularAdenosine TriphosphatasesCarrier ProteinsGTP Phosphohydrolases

Identifiers

PMID23823071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.