ArticleBMC systems biology2013
Single-cell phenomics reveals intra-species variation of phenotypic noise in yeast.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary dynamics under phenotypic uncertainty.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Differences in Metabolite Profiles and Bioactivities of Intra-Strain Variants of Marine FungusMetabolites · 2025Article
- Application of unimodal probability distribution models for morphological phenotyping of budding yeast.FEMS yeast research · 2024Article
- The cell morphological diversity of Saccharomycotina yeasts.FEMS yeast research · 2024Article
- Detecting natural selection in trait-trait coevolution.BMC ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Targeted Mutations Produce Divergent Characteristics in Pedigreed Sake Yeast Strains.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Heterosis of fitness and phenotypic variance in the evolution of a diploid gene regulatory network.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Gene loss and compensatory evolution promotes the emergence of morphological novelties in budding yeast.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- Rapid Intraspecies Evolution of Fitness Effects of Yeast Genes.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Assignment of unimodal probability distribution models for quantitative morphological phenotyping.BMC biology · 2022Article
- High-throughput platform for yeast morphological profiling predicts the targets of bioactive compounds.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2022Article
- Article
- Reduced phenotypic plasticity evolves in less predictable environments.Ecology letters · 2020Article
- Temporal encoding of bacterial identity and traits in growth dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Cell-to-cell expression dispersion of B-cell surface proteins is linked to genetic variants in humans.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Cell Biology: Marine Yeasts Deepen the Sea of Diversity.Current biology : CB · 2019Article
- Implications of maintenance of mother-bud neck size in diverse vital processes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Current genetics · 2019Article
- Cucurbitacin B Exerts Antiaging Effects in Yeast by Regulating Autophagy and Oxidative Stress.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019Article
- Article
- Global study of holistic morphological effectors in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMC genomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost quantitative measures of phenotypic traits represent macroscopic contributions of large numbers of cells. Yet, cells of a tissue do not behave similarly, and molecular studies on several organisms have shown that regulations can be highly stochastic, sometimes generating diversified cellular phenotypes within tissues. Phenotypic noise, defined here as trait variability among isogenic cells of the same type and sharing a common environment, has therefore received a lot of attention. Given the potential fitness advantage provided by phenotypic noise in fluctuating environments, the possibility that it is directly subjected to evolutionary selection is being considered. For selection to act, phenotypic noise must differ between contemporary genotypes. Whether this is the case or not remains, however, unclear because phenotypic noise has very rarely been quantified in natural populations.
resultsUsing automated image analysis, we describe here the phenotypic diversity of S. cerevisiae morphology at single-cell resolution. We profiled hundreds of quantitative traits in more than 1,000 cells of 37 natural strains, which represent various geographical and ecological origins of the species. We observed abundant trait variation between strains, with no correlation with their ecological origin or population history. Phenotypic noise strongly depended on the strain background. Noise variation was largely trait-specific (specific strains showing elevated noise for subset of traits) but also global (a few strains displaying elevated noise for many unrelated traits).
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that phenotypic noise does differ quantitatively between natural populations. This supports the possibility that, if noise is adaptive, microevolution may tune it in the wild. This tuning may happen on specific traits or by varying the degree of global phenotypic buffering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.