Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23822735›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2013

Assessment of clofazimine activity in a second-line regimen for tuberculosis in mice.

Jacques H Grosset, Sandeep Tyagi, Deepak V Almeida, Paul J Converse, Si-Yang Li, Nicole C Ammerman, William R Bishai, Donald Enarson, Arnaud Trébucq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Inhibitors of Type II NADH Dehydrogenase Enzyme: A Review.Current protein & peptide science · 2025
    Review
  6. Shortened Treatment Regimens for Drug Sensitive TB.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  7. TargetingRSC medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clofazimine for the treatment of tuberculosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacques H GrossetCenter for Tuberculosis Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA. jgrosse4@jhmi.edu
Sandeep Tyagi
Deepak V Almeida
Paul J Converse
Si-Yang Li
Nicole C Ammerman
William R Bishai
Donald Enarson
Arnaud Trébucq
Johns Hopkins University · USInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · FRHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000015I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAlthough observational studies suggest that clofazimine-containing regimens are highly active against drug-resistant tuberculosis, the contribution of clofazimine for the treatment of this disease has never been systematically evaluated.

objectivesOur goal was to directly compare the activity of a standard second-line drug regimen with or without the addition of clofazimine in a mouse model of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Our comparative outcomes included time to culture conversion in the mouse lungs and the percentage of relapses after treatment cessation.

methodsMice were aerosol-infected with an isoniazid-resistant (as a surrogate of multidrug-resistant) strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Treatment, which was administered for 5 to 9 months, was initiated 2 weeks after infection and comprised the following second-line regimen: daily (5 d/wk) moxifloxacin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, supplemented with amikacin during the first 2 months. One-half of the mice also received daily clofazimine. The decline in lung bacterial load was assessed monthly using charcoal-containing agar to reduce clofazimine carryover. Relapse was assessed 6 months after treatment cessation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsAfter 2 months, the bacillary load in lungs was reduced from 9.74 log10 at baseline to 3.61 and 4.68 in mice treated with or without clofazimine, respectively (P < 0.001). Mice treated with clofazimine were culture-negative after 5 months, whereas all mice treated without clofazimine remained heavily culture-positive for the entire 9 months of the study. The relapse rate was 7% among mice treated with clofazimine for 8 to 9 months.

conclusionsThe clofazimine contribution was substantial in these experimental conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntitubercular AgentsClofazimineDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleLungMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisRecurrenceTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntitubercular AgentsClofazimine

Identifiers

PMID23822735
PMCPMC3827279
OpenAlexW2000905457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.