Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23822508›Full record

ArticleChaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)2013

Dynamics simulations for engineering macromolecular interactions.

Avi Robinson-Mosher, Tamar Shinar, Pamela A Silver, Jeffrey Way

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Avi Robinson-MosherWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, 3 Blackfan St., Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. avi.mosher@wyss.harvard.edu
Tamar Shinar
Pamela A Silver
Jeffrey Way
Center for Systems Biology · USHarvard University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

TRANSPORT OF PROTEINS IN AND OUT OF THE NUCLEUSR01GM036373 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SILVER, PAMELA A · 1986 to 2016
$2.5M
Understanding mitotic spindle positioning by integrated modeling and experimentR01GM104976 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SHELLEY, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
Quantitative and Spatial Optimization for Designing Cancer TherapeuticsF32CA168274 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ROBINSON-MOSHER, AVRAM LEV · 2012 to 2014
$163k
NCI NIH HHS 1F32CA168274-01NCI NIH HHS F32 CA168274NIGMS NIH HHS 2R01GM036373-29NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036373NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104976NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM104976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predictable engineering of well-behaved transcriptional circuits is a central goal of synthetic biology. The artificial attachment of promoters to transcription factor genes usually results in noisy or chaotic behaviors, and such systems are unlikely to be useful in practical applications. Natural transcriptional regulation relies extensively on protein-protein interactions to insure tightly controlled behavior, but such tight control has been elusive in engineered systems. To help engineer protein-protein interactions, we have developed a molecular dynamics simulation framework that simplifies features of proteins moving by constrained Brownian motion, with the goal of performing long simulations. The behavior of a simulated protein system is determined by summation of forces that include a Brownian force, a drag force, excluded volume constraints, relative position constraints, and binding constraints that relate to experimentally determined on-rates and off-rates for chosen protein elements in a system. Proteins are abstracted as spheres. Binding surfaces are defined radially within a protein. Peptide linkers are abstracted as small protein-like spheres with rigid connections. To address whether our framework could generate useful predictions, we simulated the behavior of an engineered fusion protein consisting of two 20,000 Da proteins attached by flexible glycine/serine-type linkers. The two protein elements remained closely associated, as if constrained by a random walk in three dimensions of the peptide linker, as opposed to showing a distribution of distances expected if movement were dominated by Brownian motion of the protein domains only. We also simulated the behavior of fluorescent proteins tethered by a linker of varying length, compared the predicted Förster resonance energy transfer with previous experimental observations, and obtained a good correspondence. Finally, we simulated the binding behavior of a fusion of two ligands that could simultaneously bind to distinct cell-surface receptors, and explored the landscape of linker lengths and stiffnesses that could enhance receptor binding of one ligand when the other ligand has already bound to its receptor, thus, addressing potential mechanisms for improving targeted signal transduction proteins. These specific results have implications for the design of targeted fusion proteins and artificial transcription factors involving fusion of natural domains. More broadly, the simulation framework described here could be extended to include more detailed system features such as non-spherical protein shapes and electrostatics, without requiring detailed, computationally expensive specifications. This framework should be useful in predicting behavior of engineered protein systems including binding and dissociation reactions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGenetic EngineeringAnimalsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHumansMacromolecular SubstancesProtein BindingSignal TransductionSynthetic BiologyMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID23822508
PMCPMC3695996
OpenAlexW1995195052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.