Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23822168›Full record

ArticlePhotomedicine and laser surgery2013

Effects of photodynamic therapy on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial biofilms by bioluminescence imaging and scanning electron microscopic analysis.

Aguinaldo S Garcez, Silvia C Núñez, Nilton Azambuja, Eduardo R Fregnani, Helena M H Rodriguez, Michael R Hamblin, Hideo Suzuki, Martha S Ribeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photomedicine and laser surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. How to study biofilms: technological advancements in clinical biofilm research.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  6. A NovelBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Photodynamic Therapy With Propolis: Antibacterial Effects onJournal of lasers in medical sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aguinaldo S Garcez1 Department of Orthodontics, São Leopoldo Mandic Dental Research Center , Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil .
Silvia C Núñez
Nilton Azambuja
Eduardo R Fregnani
Helena M H Rodriguez
Michael R Hamblin
Hideo Suzuki
Martha S Ribeiro

Funding

Photodynamic Therapy of Localized InfectionsR01AI050875 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HAMBLIN, MICHAEL R · 2003 to 2017
$4.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01AI050875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to test photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an alternative approach to biofilm disruption on dental hard tissue, We evaluated the effect of methylene blue and a 660 nm diode laser on the viability and architecture of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial biofilms. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen human teeth were inoculated with bioluminescent Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Enterococcus faecalis to form 3 day biofilms in prepared root canals. Bioluminescence imaging was used to serially quantify and evaluate the bacterial viability, and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) imaging was used to assess architecture and morphology of bacterial biofilm before and after PDT employing methylene blue and 40 mW, 660 nm diode laser light delivered into the root canal via a 300 μm fiber for 240 sec, resulting in a total energy of 9.6 J. The data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey test.

resultsThe bacterial reduction showed a dose dependence; as the light energy increased, the bioluminescence decreased in both planktonic suspension and in biofilms. The SEM analysis showed a significant reduction of biofilm on the surface. PDT promoted disruption of the biofilm and the number of adherent bacteria was reduced.

conclusionsThe photodynamic effect seems to disrupt the biofilm by acting both on bacterial cells and on the extracellular matrix.

Indexed as

BiofilmsColoring AgentsDental Pulp CavityEnterococcus faecalisHumansLasers, SemiconductorLuminescenceMethylene BlueMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPseudomonas aeruginosaColoring AgentsMethylene BluePhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID23822168
PMCPMC3818004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.