ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2014
Clinical outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL): experience from a single institution.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Analyses of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Ph+ and Ph-Like-Recent Progress in Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- [Comparison of autologous versus matched sibling donor stem cell transplantation for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify factors affecting transplant outcome, data from 65 Philadelphia Chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) patients who had undergone allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (allo-HSCT) in our institution were analyzed. The probability of OS (overall survival) and DFS (disease free-survival) at 3 years after allo-HSCT was 40.1% and 38%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that gender and disease status (p = 0.0059, p = 0.0039, respectively) were significant factors for OS. Among 51 patients with CR (complete remission), multivariate analysis showed that the factors associated with OS included gender (p = 0.014), number of white blood cell at diagnosis (p = 0.025), and the source of stem cells (bone marrow <BM > versus cord blood; BM stem cell source was associated with favorable OS, p = 0.042). Twenty-one patients relapsed after allo-HSCT with a median of 207 days (range, 19-1,324 days). The estimated cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 39.4%. Patients with CR showed a lower relapse rate at 3 years (34.2%) when compared with patients with non-CR (62.7%). Among 21 patients, eight patients received imatinib-based chemotherapy and 13 received chemotherapy without imatinib before HSCT. In terms of treatment after relapse, seven patients received chemotherapy with imatinib and 13 received chemotherapy without imatinib. Five patients underwent a second HSCT. One patient survived, and 20 patients died. In this study, disease status at time of allo-HSCT had a significant impact on OS, DFS, and relapse. Imatinib administration given before allo-HSCT was not associated with favorable outcome. Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be more suitable candidates for Ph + ALL before and after allo-HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23821455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.