Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23821325›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2013

Selecting patients with locally advanced rectal cancer for neoadjuvant treatment strategies.

Alice Dewdney, David Cunningham, Ian Chau

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Adding Boost to Standard Neoadjuvant Radiation for Rectal Cancer Improves Likelihood of Complete Response.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neoadjuvant Strategies: Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alice DewdneyDepartment of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, UK.
David Cunningham
Ian Chau
Royal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal cancer remains a significant problem worldwide. Outcomes vary significantly according to the stage of disease and prognostic factors, including the distance of the tumor from the circumferential resection margin. Accurate staging, including high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, allows stratification of patients into low-, moderate-, and high-risk disease; this information can be used to inform multidisciplinary team decisions regarding the role of neoadjuvant therapy. Both neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiation reduce the risk of local recurrence compared with surgery alone, but they have little impact on survival. Although there remains a need to reduce overtreatment of those patients at moderate risk, evaluation of intensified regimens for those with high-risk disease is still required to reduce distant failure rates and improve survival in these patients with an otherwise poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPatient SelectionRectal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeChemoradiationMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant treatmentRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID23821325
PMCPMC3720638
OpenAlexW2123863371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.