Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23821233›Full record

ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2013

[Pathophysiology of fibrotic encapsulation of episcleral glaucoma drainage implants: modification for improvement of clinical results].

L Choritz, M Wegner, R Förch, U Jonas, H Thieme

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L ChoritzAugenklinik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44 (Haus 60b), 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. lars.choritz@med.ovgu.de
M Wegner
R Förch
U Jonas
H Thieme
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEFraunhofer Institute for Microengineering and Microsystems · DEMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research · DEUniversity of Siegen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episcleral glaucoma drainage implants (GDI) are being used increasingly more as a surgical option for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). One of the main reasons for failure to control IOP is the formation of water-impervious fibrotic tissue around the base plate of GDIs that prevents effective resorption of the drained aqueous humor and thus leads to an increase in IOP. Surgical removal of the fibrotic tissue can often rescue implant function; however, repeated encapsulation can often not be prevented and necessitates additional interventions up to the removal of the implant itself. The reasons for the fibrotic reaction are not fully understood. Apart from patient-dependent mechanisms that are also involved in bleb scarring after trabeculectomy, implant properties, such as size, shape, surface properties and biomaterial probably contribute to the encapsulation process. Based on the literature on this topic this article looks at possible ways of improving the design of currently used drainage implants including the potential use of GDIs as a carrier for antifibrotic medication released at low doses over an extended period of time.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineEquipment Failure AnalysisGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsHumansProsthesis DesignScleraScleral DiseasesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23821233
OpenAlexW1571529919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.