Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23821033›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2013

Oct transcription factors in development and stem cells: insights and mechanisms.

Dean Tantin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Insects · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dean TantinDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. dean.tantin@path.utah.edu
University of Utah · US

Funding

Role of Transcription Coactivator OCA-B in Gene Poising and Immunological MemoryR01AI100873 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TANTIN, DEAN · 2013 to 2022
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The POU domain family of transcription factors regulates developmental processes ranging from specification of the early embryo to terminal differentiation. About half of these factors display substantial affinity for an 8 bp DNA site termed the octamer motif, and are hence known as Oct proteins. Oct4 (Pou5f1) is a well-known Oct factor, but there are other Oct proteins with varied and essential roles in development. This Primer outlines our current understanding of Oct proteins and the regulatory mechanisms that govern their role in developmental processes and concludes with the assertion that more investigation into their developmental functions is needed.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsHumansOctamer Transcription FactorsSignal TransductionStem CellsOctamer Transcription FactorsOct proteinsPOU domainStem cells

Identifiers

PMID23821033
PMCPMC3699277
OpenAlexW2057764922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.