Response to Chronis-Tuscano et al. and Arns and Strehl.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Frontal brain activity and cognitive processing speed in multiple sclerosis: An exploration of EEG neurofeedback training.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019
   Trial
2. Evaluation of a psychoeducation programme for parents of children and adolescents with ADHD: immediate and long-term effects using a blind randomized controlled trial.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2014
   Trial
3. Learning in Neurofeedback is Heterogenous and Does Not Guarantee ADHD Symptom Improvement.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2026
   Article
4. The management of ADHD in children and adolescents: bringing evidence to the clinic: perspective from the European ADHD Guidelines Group (EAGG).European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2023
   Review
5. Neurotherapeutics for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): A Review.Cells · 2021
   Review
6. EEG neurofeedback treatments in children with ADHD: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014
   Review
7. Neurofeedback in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - different models, different ways of application.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Nonpharmacological interventions for ADHD: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of dietary and psychological treatments.2013
• Comment on
  Key issues relevant to the efficacy of behavioral treatment for ADHD.2013
• Comment on
  Evidence for efficacy of neurofeedback in ADHD?2013

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as