ArticleNature reviews. Neuroscience2013
Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power.
Article in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Environmental Protective and Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer: An Umbrella Review and Reanalysis of Meta-Analyses.Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Surgical intervention in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of decompressive craniotomy.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Pooled it
- Translational Intracerebral Hemorrhage Research: Has Current Neuroprotection Research ARRIVEd at a Standard for Experimental Design and Reporting?Translational stroke research · 2020Pooled it
- Genome-wide meta-analysis of SNP-by9-ACEI/ARB and SNP-by-thiazide diuretic and effect on serum potassium in cohorts of European and African ancestry.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2019Pooled it
- Quality of life of treatment-seeking transgender adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2018Pooled it
- Potential Reporting Bias in Neuroimaging Studies of Sex Differences.Scientific reports · 2018Pooled it
- Is there an excess of significant findings in published studies of psychotherapy for depression?Psychological medicine · 2015Pooled it
- The effect of sertraline on emotional processing: secondary analyses of the PANDA randomised controlled trial.Psychological medicine · 2022Trial
- Reproducibility in biomedical research.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Biological Markers of Cognitive Impairments in Combat and Contact-Sport Athletes: A Systematic Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Courses of depressive symptoms and diabetes incidence among middle-aged and older adults: A prospective study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Replicability and generalizability in population psychiatric neuroimaging.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Improving Likert scale big data analysis in psychometric health economics: reliability of the new compositional data approach.Brain informatics · 2024Article
- Associations between somatomotor-putamen resting state connectivity and obsessive-compulsive symptoms vary as a function of stress during early adolescence: Data from the ABCD study.Brain research bulletin · 2024Article
- Article
- Older men and loneliness: a cross-sectional study of sex differences in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Finding the right power balance: Better study design and collaboration can reduce dependence on statistical power.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Atypical cortical networks in children at high-genetic risk of psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Dimensional and transdiagnostic phenotypes in psychiatric genome-wide association studies.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- Observational evidence of legacy effects of the 2018 drought on a mixed deciduous forest in Germany.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23820778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.