Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23820605›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2013

Intra-phylum and inter-phyla associations among gastrointestinal parasites in two wild mammal species.

P G Moreno, M A T Eberhardt, D Lamattina, M A Previtali, P M Beldomenico

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Determinants ofParasitology · 2021
    Article
  4. Parasite species co-occurrence patterns onInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Temporal and demographic blood parasite dynamics in two free-ranging neotropical primates.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Detection ofVeterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Complex interactions within the ectoparasite community of the eastern rock sengi (Elephantulus myurus).International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P G MorenoLaboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades, Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral, Universidad Nacional del Litoral-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, RP Kreder 2805, 3080, Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina.
M A T Eberhardt
D Lamattina
M A Previtali
P M Beldomenico

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of literature reveals that the interactions among the parasite community may be strong and significant for parasite dynamics. There may be inter-specific antagonistic interactions as a result of competition and cross-effective immune response, or synergistic interactions where infection by one parasite is facilitated by another one, either by an impoverishment of the host's defenses, parasite-induced selective immunosuppression, or trade-offs within the immune system. The nature of these interactions may depend on how related are the parasite species involved. Here we explored the presence of associations among gastrointestinal parasites (coccidia and helminths) in natural populations of two wild mammal species, the capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) and the guanaco (Lama guanicoe). The associations explored were between the oocyst outputs of a selected Eimeria species and the other coccidia of that parasite community, and between Eimeria spp. and the predominant nematodes. The statistical analysis included adjustment for potential confounders or effect modifiers. In guanacos, the prevailing interactions were synergistic among the coccidia and between coccidia and nematodes (Nematodirus spp.). However, in capybaras, the interaction between nematodes (Viannaiidae) and Eimeria spp. depended on environmental and host factors. The relationship was positive in some circumstances (depending on season, year, sex, or animal size), but it appeared to become antagonistic under different scenarios. These antagonist interactions did not follow a particular seasonal pattern (they occurred in autumn, spring, and summer), but they were predominantly found in females (when they depended on sex) or in 2010 and 2011 (when they depended on the sampling year). These results suggest that the relationship between coccidia and nematodes in capybaras may be context dependent. We propose that the context-dependent immune investment documented in capybaras may be the cause of these varying interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCamelids, New WorldCoccidiaCoccidiosisCoinfectionEimeriaEnvironmentFecesFemaleHost-Parasite InteractionsIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticMaleNematodaNematode InfectionsOocystsRodent Diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.