ArticleParasitology research2013
Intra-phylum and inter-phyla associations among gastrointestinal parasites in two wild mammal species.
Article in Parasitology research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural infection of free-ranging capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) with Anaplasmataecea and Rickettsiaceae bacteria in the Iberá wetlands ecoregion, Argentina.Veterinary research communications · 2024Article
- Gastrointestinal parasite diversity of South American camelids (Artiodactyla: Camelidae): First review throughout the native range of distribution.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022Review
- Determinants ofParasitology · 2021Article
- Parasite species co-occurrence patterns onInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020Article
- Endoparasites of Selected Native Non-Domesticated Mammals in the Neotropics (New World Tropics).Veterinary sciences · 2019Review
- Parasitic nematodes simultaneously suppress and benefit from coccidian coinfection in their natural mouse host.Parasitology · 2019Article
- Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematodes of alpacas in Australia: II. A longitudinal study.Parasitology research · 2019Article
- Temporal and demographic blood parasite dynamics in two free-ranging neotropical primates.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2017Article
- Helminth parasitism in two closely related South African rodents: abundance, prevalence, species richness and impinging factors.Parasitology research · 2017Article
- Detection ofVeterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports · 2016Article
- Evidence for interspecific interactions in the ectoparasite infracommunity of a wild mammal.Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
- Complex interactions within the ectoparasite community of the eastern rock sengi (Elephantulus myurus).International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing body of literature reveals that the interactions among the parasite community may be strong and significant for parasite dynamics. There may be inter-specific antagonistic interactions as a result of competition and cross-effective immune response, or synergistic interactions where infection by one parasite is facilitated by another one, either by an impoverishment of the host's defenses, parasite-induced selective immunosuppression, or trade-offs within the immune system. The nature of these interactions may depend on how related are the parasite species involved. Here we explored the presence of associations among gastrointestinal parasites (coccidia and helminths) in natural populations of two wild mammal species, the capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) and the guanaco (Lama guanicoe). The associations explored were between the oocyst outputs of a selected Eimeria species and the other coccidia of that parasite community, and between Eimeria spp. and the predominant nematodes. The statistical analysis included adjustment for potential confounders or effect modifiers. In guanacos, the prevailing interactions were synergistic among the coccidia and between coccidia and nematodes (Nematodirus spp.). However, in capybaras, the interaction between nematodes (Viannaiidae) and Eimeria spp. depended on environmental and host factors. The relationship was positive in some circumstances (depending on season, year, sex, or animal size), but it appeared to become antagonistic under different scenarios. These antagonist interactions did not follow a particular seasonal pattern (they occurred in autumn, spring, and summer), but they were predominantly found in females (when they depended on sex) or in 2010 and 2011 (when they depended on the sampling year). These results suggest that the relationship between coccidia and nematodes in capybaras may be context dependent. We propose that the context-dependent immune investment documented in capybaras may be the cause of these varying interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23820605What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.