Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23820513›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2014

Maximizing peptide identification events in proteomic workflows using data-dependent acquisition (DDA).

Nicholas W Bateman, Scott P Goulding, Nicholas J Shulman, Avinash K Gadok, Karen K Szumlinski, Michael J MacCoss, Christine C Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proteomics for Microalgae Extracts by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Mass spectrometry-based retina proteomics.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas W BatemanDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261;
Scott P Goulding
Nicholas J Shulman
Avinash K Gadok
Karen K Szumlinski
Michael J MacCoss
Christine C Wu

Funding

TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Skyline Targeted Proteomics EnvironmentR01GM103551 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2020
$3.4M
NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING GRANTT32HD041697 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI RESTREPO, DIEGO · 2001 to 2015
$2.4M
Analysis of Protein Dynamics in C. elegans by mLC/MS/MSR01DK069386 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2006 to 2013
$2.3M
Molecular regulation of CeA glutamate and binge drinkingR01AA016650 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI SZUMLINSKI, KAREN KATHLEEN · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Homer-mediated signaling and cocaine addictionR01DA024038 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI SZUMLINSKI, KAREN KATHLEEN · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
Proteomic Dissection of Withdrawal-Induced Excessive DrinkingU01AA016653 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, CHRISTINE C · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Alcoholic Fatty Liver BiogenesisR01AA016171 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, CHRISTINE C · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016171NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA016171NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016650NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA016653NIAAA NIH HHS U01AA016653NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD041697NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024038NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069386NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current analytical strategies for collecting proteomic data using data-dependent acquisition (DDA) are limited by the low analytical reproducibility of the method. Proteomic discovery efforts that exploit the benefits of DDA, such as providing peptide sequence information, but that enable improved analytical reproducibility, represent an ideal scenario for maximizing measureable peptide identifications in "shotgun"-type proteomic studies. Therefore, we propose an analytical workflow combining DDA with retention time aligned extracted ion chromatogram (XIC) areas obtained from high mass accuracy MS1 data acquired in parallel. We applied this workflow to the analyses of sample matrixes prepared from mouse blood plasma and brain tissues and observed increases in peptide detection of up to 30.5% due to the comparison of peptide MS1 XIC areas following retention time alignment of co-identified peptides. Furthermore, we show that the approach is quantitative using peptide standards diluted into a complex matrix. These data revealed that peptide MS1 XIC areas provide linear response of over three orders of magnitude down to low femtomole (fmol) levels. These findings argue that augmenting "shotgun" proteomic workflows with retention time alignment of peptide identifications and comparative analyses of corresponding peptide MS1 XIC areas improve the analytical performance of global proteomic discovery methods using DDA.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryProteomicsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsChromatography, LiquidMicePeptidesSoftwarePeptides

Identifiers

PMID23820513
PMCPMC3879624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.