Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23819836›Full record

SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2013

The health economic impact of disease management programs for COPD: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Melinde R S Boland, Apostolos Tsiachristas, Annemarije L Kruis, Niels H Chavannes, Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of the COPDnet integrated care model in patients with COPD: the study protocol.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Tele-medicine in respiratory diseases.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2017
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Telemedicine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melinde R S BolandInstitute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. boland@bmg.eur.nl
Apostolos Tsiachristas
Annemarije L Kruis
Niels H Chavannes
Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is insufficient evidence of the cost-effectiveness of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Disease Management (COPD-DM) programs. The aim of this review is to evaluate the economic impact of COPD-DM programs and investigate the relation between the impact on healthcare costs and health outcomes. We also investigated the impact of patient-, intervention, and study-characteristics.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review to identify cost-effectiveness studies of COPD-DM. Where feasible, results were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis and explorative subgroup analyses were performed.

resultsSixteen papers describing 11 studies were included (7 randomized control trials (RCT), 2 pre-post, 2 case-control). Meta-analysis showed that COPD-DM led to hospitalization savings of €1060 (95% CI: €2040 to €80) per patient per year and savings in total healthcare utilization of €898 (95% CI: €1566 to €231) (excl. operating costs). In these health economic studies small but positive results on health outcomes were found, such as the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, which decreased with 1.7 points (95% CI: 0.5-2.9). There was great variability in DM interventions-, study- and patient-characteristics. There were indications that DM showed greater savings in studies with: severe COPD patients, patients with a history of exacerbations, RCT study design, high methodological quality, few different professions involved in the program, and study setting outside Europe.

conclusionsCOPD-DM programs were found to have favourable effects on both health outcomes and costs, but there is considerable heterogeneity depending on patient-, intervention-, and study-characteristics.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareEconomicsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID23819836
PMCPMC3704961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.