Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23819610›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2013

Cytosolic phosphorylated EGFR is predictive of recurrence in early stage penile cancer patients: a retropective study.

Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Sisto Perdonà, Carlo Buonerba, Guru Sonpavde, Vincenzo Gigantino, Giuseppe Pannone, Giuseppe Quarto, Matteo Ferro, Gabriella Gaudioso, Daniela Terracciano and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Penile cancer: Updates in systemic therapy.Asian journal of urology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Immunotherapy for penile cancer.Future science OA · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
Sisto Perdonà
Carlo Buonerba
Guru Sonpavde
Vincenzo Gigantino
Giuseppe Pannone
Giuseppe Quarto
Matteo Ferro
Gabriella Gaudioso
Daniela Terracciano
Rossella Di Trolio
Pasquale Rescigno
Gerardo Botti
Sabino De Placido
Gaetano Facchini
Paolo A Ascierto
Renato Franco
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPenile cancer (PC) is a rare tumor, and therapeutic options are limited for this disease, with an overall 5-year overall survival around 65-70%. Adjuvant therapy is not recommended for patients with N0-1 disease, despite up to 60% of these patients will die within 5 years from diagnosis.

methodsMedical records of all patients who underwent radical surgery at University Federico II of Naples and at National Tumor Institute "Pascale" of Naples for early squamous cell carcinoma of the penis from January, 2000 to December, 2011 were retrieved. Paraffin wax embedded tissue specimens were retrieved from the pathology archives of the participating Institutions for all patients. Expression of p-EGFR, EGFR and positivity to HPV were evaluated along with other histological variables of interest. Demographic data of eligible patients were retrieved along with clinical characteristics such as type of surgical operation, time of follow up, time of recurrence, overall survival. A multivariable model was constructed using a forward stepwise selection procedure.

resultsThirty eligible patients were identified. All patients were positive for EGFR by immunohistochemistry, while 13 and 16 were respectively positive for nuclear and cytosolic p-EGFR. No EGFR amplification was detected by FISH. Eight patients were positive for high-risk HPV by ISH. On univariable analysis, corpora cavernosa infiltration (OR 7.8; 95% CI=0,8 to 75,6; P=0,039) and positivity for cytosolic p-EGFR (OR 7.6; 95% CI =1.49 to 50; P = 0.009) were predictive for recurrence, while only positivity for cytosolic p-EGFR (HR =9.0; 95% CI 1.0-100; P=0,0116) was prognostic for poor survival.

conclusionIt is of primary importance to identify patients with N0-1 disease who are at increased risk of recurrence, as they do not normally receive any adjuvant therapy. Expression of p-EGFR was found in this series to be strongly related to increase risk of recurrence and shorter overall survival. This finding is consistent with the role of p-EGFR in other solid malignancies. Integration of p-EGFR with classic prognostic factors and other histology markers should be pursued to establish optimal adjuvant therapy for N0-1 PC patients.

Indexed as

AgedCytosolErbB ReceptorsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPenile NeoplasmsPhosphorylationRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID23819610
PMCPMC3717121
OpenAlexW2149773975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.