ArticleBMC health services research2013
"A manager in the minds of doctors:" a comparison of new modes of control in European hospitals.
Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organizing as negotiation: the construction of a pathway in Norwegian mental health services.International journal of mental health systems · 2021Article
- Confronting power in low places: historical analysis of medical dominance and role-boundary negotiation between health professions in Nigeria.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Professionalism in Science: Competence, Autonomy, and Service.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Beyond hybrid professionals: evidence from the hospital sector.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Physicians' professional autonomy and their organizational identification with their hospital.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Policing the profession? Regulatory reform, restratification and the emergence of Responsible Officers as a new locus of power in UK medicine.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2018Article
- Managerial strategies to make incentives meaningful and motivating.Journal of health organization and management · 2017Article
- Article
- Reconfiguring health workforce: a case-based comparative study explaining the increasingly diverse professional roles in Europe.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Medicine and management: looking inside the box of changing hospital governance.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Comparing medicine and management: methodological issues.BMC health services research · 2016Review
- Hybrid management, organizational configuration, and medical professionalism: evidence from the establishment of a clinical directorate in Portugal.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- The involvement of medical doctors in hospital governance and implications for quality management: a quick scan in 19 and an in depth study in 7 OECD countries.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- The making of local hospital discharge arrangements: specifying the role of professional groups.BMC health services research · 2015Article
- Caseload midwifery as organisational change: the interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Article
- Measuring clinical management by physicians and nurses in European hospitals: development and validation of two scales.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014Article
- Bridging knowledge to develop an action plan for integrated care for chronic diseases in Greece.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital governance increasingly combines management and professional self-governance. This article maps the new emergent modes of control in a comparative perspective and aims to better understand the relationship between medicine and management as hybrid and context-dependent. Theoretically, we critically review approaches into the managerialism-professionalism relationship; methodologically, we expand cross-country comparison towards the meso-level of organisations; and empirically, the focus is on processes and actors in a range of European hospitals.
methodsThe research is explorative and was carried out as part of the FP7 COST action IS0903 Medicine and Management, Working Group 2. Comprising seven European countries, the focus is on doctors and public hospitals. We use a comparative case study design that primarily draws on expert information and document analysis as well as other secondary sources.
resultsThe findings reveal that managerial control is not simply an external force but increasingly integrated in medical professionalism. These processes of change are relevant in all countries but shaped by organisational settings, and therefore create different patterns of control: (1) 'integrated' control with high levels of coordination and coherent patterns for cost and quality controls; (2) 'partly integrated' control with diversity of coordination on hospital and department level and between cost and quality controls; and (3) 'fragmented' control with limited coordination and gaps between quality control more strongly dominated by medicine, and cost control by management.
conclusionsOur comparison highlights how organisations matter and brings the crucial relevance of 'coordination' of medicine and management across the levels (hospital/department) and the substance (cost/quality-safety) of control into perspective. Consequently, coordination may serve as a taxonomy of emergent modes of control, thus bringing new directions for cost-efficient and quality-effective hospital governance into perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.