ArticleActa naturae2013
The evolutionary pathway of x chromosome inactivation in mammals.
Article in Acta naturae, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- The long-lived immune system of centenarians.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
- A researcher's guide to studying sex differences in immune aging.Trends in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Human XIST: Origin and Divergence of aNon-coding RNA · 2025Review
- Dissection of X chromosome dosage compensation for quantitative traits in sheep using different statistical models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cdk8 and Hira mutations trigger X chromosome elimination in naive female hybrid mouse embryonic stem cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024Article
- Compensation of gene dosage on the mammalian X.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
- Endothelin-3 is epigenetically silenced in endometrioid endometrial cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Chromosomal and gonadal factors regulate microglial sex effects in the aging brain.Brain research bulletin · 2023Review
- Sex differences in number of X chromosomes and X-chromosome inactivation in females promote greater variability in hearing among males.Biology of sex differences · 2022Article
- Do Ty3/Gypsy Transposable Elements Play Preferential Roles in Sex Chromosome Differentiation?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Koala methylomes reveal divergent and conserved DNA methylation signatures of X chromosome regulation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Marsupial chromosome DNA content and genome size assessed from flow karyotypes: invariable low autosomal GC content.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Noncoding RNAs in the Regulation of Pluripotency and Reprogramming.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2018Review
- Evolutionary conservation of long non-coding RNAs; sequence, structure, function.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2014Review
- Chromosome-wide profiling of X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic states in fetal brain and placenta of the opossum, Monodelphis domestica.Genome research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X chromosome inactivation is a complex process that occurs in marsupial and eutherian mammals. The process is thought to have arisen during the differentiation of mammalian sex chromosomes to achieve an equal dosage of X chromosome genes in males and females. The differences in the X chromosome inactivation processes in marsupial and eutherian mammals are considered, and the hypotheses on its origin and evolution are discussed in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23819035PMC3695352W2055665What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.