Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23818985›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Diabetic mouse model of orthopaedic implant-related Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Arianna B Lovati, Lorenzo Drago, Lorenzo Monti, Elena De Vecchi, Sara Previdi, Giuseppe Banfi, Carlo L Romanò

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Innovations in osteomyelitis research: A review of animal models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Impact of Bacterial Infections on Osteogenesis: Evidence From In Vivo Studies.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Arianna B LovatiCell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Gruppo Ospedaliero San Donato Foundation, Milan, Italy. arianna.lovati@grupposandonato.it
Lorenzo Drago
Lorenzo Monti
Elena De Vecchi
Sara Previdi
Giuseppe Banfi
Carlo L Romanò
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITGruppo CLAS (Italy) · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic bacterial infections represent one of the most challenging orthopaedic complications that often require implant removal and surgical debridement and carry high social and economical costs. Diabetes is one of the most relevant risk factors of implant-related infection and its clinical occurrence is growing worldwide. The aim of the present study was to test a model of implant-related infection in the diabetic mouse, with a view to allow further investigation on the relative efficacy of prevention and treatment options in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. METHODOLOGY: A cohort of diabetic NOD/ShiLtJ mice was compared with non-diabetic CD1 mice as an in vivo model of S. aureus orthopaedic infection of bone and soft tissues after femur intramedullary pin implantation. We tested control and infected groups with 1×10(3) colony-forming units of S. aureus ATCC 25923 strain injected in the implant site. At 4 weeks post-inoculation, host response to infection, microbial biofilm formation, and bone damage were assessed by traditional diagnostic parameters (bacterial culture, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count), histological analysis and imaging techniques (micro computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy).

resultsUnlike the controls and the CD1 mice, all the diabetic mice challenged with a single inoculum of S. aureus displayed severe osteomyelitic changes around the implant.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate for the first time that the diabetic mouse can be successfully used in a model of orthopaedic implant-related infection. Furthermore, the same bacteria inoculum induced periprosthetic infection in all the diabetic mice but not in the controls. This animal model of implant-related infection in diabetes may be a useful tool to test in vivo treatments in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBiofilmsColony Count, MicrobialC-Reactive ProteinDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Disease Models, AnimalFemurHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOrthopedic ProceduresProstheses and ImplantsProsthesis-Related InfectionsC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID23818985
PMCPMC3688606
OpenAlexW1994215461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.