Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23818838›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

The ability of flux balance analysis to predict evolution of central metabolism scales with the initial distance to the optimum.

William R Harcombe, Nigel F Delaney, Nicholas Leiby, Niels Klitgord, Christopher J Marx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Global epistasis on fitness landscapes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Investigating the Evolution and Development of Biological Systems from the Perspective of Thermo-Kinetics and Systems Theory.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A model for the interplay between plastic tradeoffs and evolution in changing environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William R HarcombeDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nigel F Delaney
Nicholas Leiby
Niels Klitgord
Christopher J Marx

Funding

Harvard Systems Biology Graduate ProgramT32GM080177 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHISON, TIMOTHY J, MURRAY, ANDREW W · 2010 to 2019
$2.8M
Systems-level physiological basis of selection and epistasis in adaptationR01GM078209 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MARX, CHRISTOPHER J · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM078209NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078209NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most powerful genome-scale framework to model metabolism, flux balance analysis (FBA), is an evolutionary optimality model. It hypothesizes selection upon a proposed optimality criterion in order to predict the set of internal fluxes that would maximize fitness. Here we present a direct test of the optimality assumption underlying FBA by comparing the central metabolic fluxes predicted by multiple criteria to changes measurable by a (13)C-labeling method for experimentally-evolved strains. We considered datasets for three Escherichia coli evolution experiments that varied in their length, consistency of environment, and initial optimality. For ten populations that were evolved for 50,000 generations in glucose minimal medium, we observed modest changes in relative fluxes that led to small, but significant decreases in optimality and increased the distance to the predicted optimal flux distribution. In contrast, seven populations evolved on the poor substrate lactate for 900 generations collectively became more optimal and had flux distributions that moved toward predictions. For three pairs of central metabolic knockouts evolved on glucose for 600-800 generations, there was a balance between cases where optimality and flux patterns moved toward or away from FBA predictions. Despite this variation in predictability of changes in central metabolism, two generalities emerged. First, improved growth largely derived from evolved increases in the rate of substrate use. Second, FBA predictions bore out well for the two experiments initiated with ancestors with relatively sub-optimal yield, whereas those begun already quite optimal tended to move somewhat away from predictions. These findings suggest that the tradeoff between rate and yield is surprisingly modest. The observed positive correlation between rate and yield when adaptation initiated further from the optimum resulted in the ability of FBA to use stoichiometric constraints to predict the evolution of metabolism despite selection for rate.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMetabolismCarbon IsotopesEscherichia coliGlucoseLactic AcidCarbon IsotopesGlucoseLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID23818838
PMCPMC3688462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.