Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23818515›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2013

The pneumococcus: epidemiology, microbiology, and pathogenesis.

Birgitta Henriques-Normark, Elaine I Tuomanen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 226 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Change in the distribution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Birgitta Henriques-NormarkDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor, and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Elaine I Tuomanen

Funding

Y-Globin Gene Therapy Using In Vivo SelectionU54HL070590 · NHLBI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI TUOMANEN, ELAINE I · 2003 to 2011
$13.8M
PNEUMOCOCCAL CELL WALL IN MENINGITISR01AI027913 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI TUOMANEN, ELAINE I · 1989 to 2015
$5.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL-070590NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL070590NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI027913NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI-27913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pneumococcus is the classic Gram-positive extracellular pathogen. The medical burden of diseases it causes is amongst the greatest in the world. Intense study for more than 100 years has yielded an understanding of fundamental aspects of its physiology, pathogenesis, and immunity. Efforts to control infection have led to the deployment of polysaccharide vaccines and an understanding of antibiotic resistance. The inflammatory response to pneumococci, one of the most potent in medicine, has revealed the double-edged sword of clearance of infection but at a cost of damage to host cells. In virtually every aspect of the infectious process, the pneumococcus has set the rules of the Gram-positive pathogenesis game.

Indexed as

BacteremiaBacterial CapsulesBacterial ProteinsFimbriae, BacterialGenome, BacterialHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMeningitis, BacterialNasopharynxPneumococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pneumoniaeTransformation, BacterialBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23818515
PMCPMC3685878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.