Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23818334›Full record

ArticleCA: a cancer journal for clinicians

Strategies for expanding colorectal cancer screening at community health centers.

Mona Sarfaty, Mary Doroshenk, James Hotz, Durado Brooks, Seiji Hayashi, Terry C Davis, Djenaba Joseph, David Stevens, Donald L Weaver, Michael B Potter and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mona SarfatyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. mona.sarfaty@jefferson.edu
Mary Doroshenk
James Hotz
Durado Brooks
Seiji Hayashi
Terry C Davis
Djenaba Joseph
David Stevens
Donald L Weaver
Michael B Potter
Richard Wender

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health centers are uniquely positioned to address disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening as they have addressed other disparities. In 2012, the federal Health Resources and Services Administration, which is the funding agency for the health center program, added a requirement that health centers report CRC screening rates as a standard performance measure. These annually reported, publically available data are a major strategic opportunity to improve screening rates for CRC. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act enacted provisions to expand the capacity of the federal health center program. The recent report of the Institute of Medicine on integrating public health and primary care included an entire section devoted to CRC screening as a target for joint work. These developments make this the ideal time to integrate lifesaving CRC screening into the preventive care already offered by health centers. This article offers 5 strategies that address the challenges health centers face in increasing CRC screening rates. The first 2 strategies focus on improving the processes of primary care. The third emphasizes working productively with other medical providers and institutions. The fourth strategy is about aligning leadership. The final strategy is focused on using tools that have been derived from models that work.

Indexed as

Community Health CentersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Clinical ProtocolsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsContinuity of Patient CareCooperative BehaviorEarly Detection of CancerFecesGovernment AgenciesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansImmunochemistryInterinstitutional RelationsMass Screeningcolorectal cancer screeningcommunity health centersPatient Centered Medical Homepublic healthquality/quality improvementstrategies or strategic planning

Identifiers

PMID23818334
PMCPMC12288608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.