ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2013
Extent of lymphadenectomy does not predict survival in patients treated with primary esophagectomy.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Dissected Lymph Node Count and Positive Lymph Node Ratio Following Esophagectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in 1023 consecutive esophageal cancer patients: a single-center experience.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Right Compared With Left Thoracic Approach Esophagectomy for Patients With Middle Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Comparison of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and Sweet esophagectomy for the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Review
- Prognostic value of right upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy in Sweet procedure for esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Left thoracotomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma: still Sweet enough?Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Involved-field radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: theory and practice.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2016Review
- [Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer : Evolution of management and prognosis over the last 3 decades].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Article
- Current status of predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of lymph nodes resected and its impact on survival for patients with esophageal cancer remains undefined. Current guidelines recommend extended lymphadenectomy in patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We reviewed our single institutional experience with nodal harvest for esophageal cancer in a non-neoadjuvant therapy setting.
methodsPatients who underwent esophagectomy as primary therapy were indentified from a prospectively maintained database consisting of 704 patients who underwent esophagectomy. Patients were stratified by number of lymph nodes (LN) resected: >5, 10, 12, 15, or 20. Survival, clinical, and pathologic parameters were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves, chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate.
resultsWe identified 246 patients who underwent esophagectomy as initial treatment. The mean age was 65 ±10 years. The majority of patients were male (87%). Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was performed for 71%, minimally invasive esophagectomy for 15%, transhiatal esophagectomy for 12%, and three-field esophagectomy for 2%. At 60 months follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with < vs. >5 LN resected (p = 0.74 and p = 0.67, respectively) or in the < vs. >10 (p = 0.33, p = 0.11), 12 (p = 0.82, p = 0.90), 15 (p = 0.45, p = 0.79), or 20 (p = 0.72, p = 0.86) resected LN groups. Patients were then subdivided into node-positive and node-negative cohorts and stratified by nodal harvest. In the subgroups of patients with node-negative and node-positive disease, OS and DFS also did not significantly differ between groups with respect to number of nodes resected (p > 0.05). A total of 49 (20%) patients developed recurrent disease; however, recurrence was not statistically associated with number of LN resected (p > 0.05).
conclusionWe found no impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on overall or disease-free survival in patients treated with esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, the number of nodes resected at esophagectomy did not affect recurrence rates. Current recommendations for increased nodal resection during esophagectomy in patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy may not improve patient outcomes, and this phenomenon warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.