Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23817798›Full record

ReviewPhysiology (Bethesda, Md.)2013

Hypertension: what's sex got to do with it?

Margaret A Zimmerman, Jennifer C Sullivan

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Sex Differences in the Renal Vascular Responses of ATInternational journal of hypertension · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Sex-specific computational models for blood pressure regulation in the rat.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Gender Differences in Hypertension.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Margaret A ZimmermanDepartment of Medicine, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, USA.
Jennifer C Sullivan

Funding

Sexual dimorphisms of renin-angiotensin system in hypertension and renal injuryR01HL093271 · NHLBI · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI SULLIVAN, JENNIFER C · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01 HL-093271-01A1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is a complex and multifaceted disease, and there are well established sex differences in many aspects of blood pressure (BP) control. The intent of this review is to highlight recent work examining sex differences in the molecular mechanisms of BP control in hypertension to assess whether the "one-size-fits-all" approach to BP control is appropriate with regard to sex.

Indexed as

Sex FactorsAnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23817798
PMCPMC3742130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.