Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23817284›Full record

Trial reportNursing research

Nurse care coordination and technology effects on health status of frail older adults via enhanced self-management of medication: randomized clinical trial to test efficacy.

Karen Dorman Marek, Frank Stetzer, Polly A Ryan, Linda Denison Bub, Scott J Adams, Andrea Schlidt, Rachelle Lancaster, Anne-Marie O'Brien

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Cost analysis of a home-based nurse care coordination program.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2014
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Karen Dorman MarekCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004-0698, USA. Karen.Marek@asu.edu
Frank Stetzer
Polly A Ryan
Linda Denison Bub
Scott J Adams
Andrea Schlidt
Rachelle Lancaster
Anne-Marie O'Brien
Arizona State University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USFroedtert Hospital · USMarianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Oshkosh · US

Funding

Home Care Medication Management for the Frail ElderlyR01NR008911 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI ADAMS, SCOTT J · 2006 to 2010
$2.1M
Center for Enhancement of Self-Management in Individuals and FamiliesP20NR010674 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI SCHIFFMAN, RACHEL F. · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NINR NIH HHS 1P20NR010674NINR NIH HHS 5R01NR008911NINR NIH HHS P20 NR010674NINR NIH HHS R01 NR008911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-management of complex medication regimens for chronic illness is challenging for many older adults.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate health status outcomes of frail older adults receiving a home-based support program that emphasized self-management of medications using both care coordination and technology.

designThis study used a randomized controlled trial with three arms and longitudinal outcome measurement.

settingOlder adults having difficulty in self-managing medications (n = 414) were recruited at discharge from three Medicare-certified home healthcare agencies in a Midwestern urban area.

methodsAll participants received baseline pharmacy screens. The control group received no further intervention. A team of advanced practice nurses and registered nurses coordinated care for 12 months to two intervention groups who also received either an MD.2 medication-dispensing machine or a medplanner. Health status outcomes (the Geriatric Depression Scale, Mini Mental Status Examination, Physical Performance Test, and SF-36 Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary) were measured at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

resultsAfter covariate and baseline health status adjustment, time × group interactions for the MD.2 and medplanner groups on health status outcomes were not significant. Time × group interactions were significant for the medplanner and control group comparisons. DISCUSSION: Participants with care coordination had significantly better health status outcomes over time than those in the control group, but addition of the MD.2 machine to nurse care coordination did not result in better health status outcomes.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyHealth StatusSelf CareAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseHealth Services for the AgedHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedMidwestern United StatesNursing CareProgram EvaluationSelf Medication

Identifiers

PMID23817284
PMCPMC3706033
OpenAlexW2074546355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.