Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23815817›Full record

ReviewCell communication and signaling : CCS2013

Recent development and biomedical applications of probabilistic Boolean networks.

Panuwat Trairatphisan, Andrzej Mizera, Jun Pang, Alexandru Adrian Tantar, Jochen Schneider, Thomas Sauter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Verifiable biology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Boolean modelling in plant biology.Quantitative plant biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Boolean network modeling in systems pharmacology.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Panuwat TrairatphisanLife Sciences Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg. panuwat.trairatphisan@uni.lu
Andrzej Mizera
Jun Pang
Alexandru Adrian Tantar
Jochen Schneider
Thomas Sauter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probabilistic Boolean network (PBN) modelling is a semi-quantitative approach widely used for the study of the topology and dynamic aspects of biological systems. The combined use of rule-based representation and probability makes PBN appealing for large-scale modelling of biological networks where degrees of uncertainty need to be considered.A considerable expansion of our knowledge in the field of theoretical research on PBN can be observed over the past few years, with a focus on network inference, network intervention and control. With respect to areas of applications, PBN is mainly used for the study of gene regulatory networks though with an increasing emergence in signal transduction, metabolic, and also physiological networks. At the same time, a number of computational tools, facilitating the modelling and analysis of PBNs, are continuously developed.A concise yet comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art on PBN modelling is offered in this article, including a comparative discussion on PBN versus similar models with respect to concepts and biomedical applications. Due to their many advantages, we consider PBN to stand as a suitable modelling framework for the description and analysis of complex biological systems, ranging from molecular to physiological levels.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, StatisticalProbabilityGene Regulatory NetworksHumans

Identifiers

PMID23815817
PMCPMC3726340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.