Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2013
Nitroglycerin 0.4% ointment vs placebo in the treatment of pain resulting from chronic anal fissure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00522041 (A Randomized. Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-national Study to Determine the Effect of Cellegesic Nitroglycerin Ointment 0.4%), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized. Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-national Study to Determine the Effect of Cellegesic Nitroglycerin Ointment 0.4% (Cellegesic) on the Pain Associated With a Chronic Anal Fissure
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of topical sphincterotomy treatments for anal fissure.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Pooled it
- Botulinum Toxin Injection for Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Is There Any Dose-Dependent Efficiency? A Meta-Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2016Pooled it
- Myoxinol ointment for the treatment of acute fissure.Updates in surgery · 2017Trial
- The effect of lavender aromatherapy and acetaminophen as preemptive on comfort and Nitroglycerin-induced headache in acute coronary syndrome.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2025Article
- Is chemodenervation with incobotulinumtoxinA an alternative to invasive chronic anal fissure treatments?BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Management of complications following implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Benign Anorectal Disorder Management in Low-Resource Settings.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2022Review
- The Effect of Low-Dose Nitroglycerin Ointment on Skin Flap Necrosis in Breast Reconstruction after Skin-Sparing or Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.Archives of plastic surgery · 2017Article
- Increasing efficacy and reducing side effects in treatment of chronic anal fissures: A study of topical diazepam therapy.Medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplications of chronic anal fissure (CAF) treatments are prompting interest in lower-risk therapies. This study was conducted to compare nitroglycerin (NTG) 0.4% ointment with placebo for pain associated with CAF.
methodsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with one CAF and moderate-to-severe pain (≥50 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]) received 375 mg NTG 0.4% (1.5 mg active ingredient) or 375 mg placebo ointment applied anally every 12 hours for 21 days. The primary end point was change from baseline VAS score in 24-hour pain averaged over days 14-18. Review of data from patients who withdrew early was blinded to treatment. To control for the confounding effects of analgesics, all patients received 650 mg acetaminophen for headache prophylaxis before each application.
resultsA total of 247 patients were enrolled (NTG, n = 123; placebo, n = 124). The prespecified baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) analysis found no significant difference between groups; however, a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis showed a significant advantage for NTG. A post hoc analysis (LOCF/BOCF hybrid) demonstrated a significant adjusted mean difference of -7.0 mm in favor of NTG 0.4% (95% CI -13.6, -0.4; P = .038). Headache was the most common adverse event in the NTG (69.9%) and placebo (47.6%) groups.
conclusionsThis was the first placebo-controlled study that also controlled for the confounding effects of analgesics used to treat NTG-induced headache. In patients with moderate-to-severe CAF pain, NTG 0.4% ointment effectively reduced CAF pain compared with placebo.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00522041.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.