ArticleJACC. Heart failure2013
Aldosterone antagonists and outcomes in real-world older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Article in JACC. Heart failure, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association is not causation: treatment effects cannot be estimated from observational data in heart failure.European heart journal · 2018Pooled it
- Beta-blockers in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: class, dosage, and outcomes.International journal of cardiology · 2014Trial
- Left atrial energy loss as a novel predictor of mortality and cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients with preserved ejection fraction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Heart Failure in Older Patients: An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current understanding and future prospects.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- The Concept of "Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction": Time for a Critical Reappraisal.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Elderly Patients: Effectiveness and Safety.Cureus · 2023Review
- Digoxin Initiation and Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.The American journal of medicine · 2020Article
- Sudden death in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and beyond: an elusive target.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- Spironolactone and Outcomes in Older Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.The American journal of medicine · 2019Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in the Very Elderly Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure: Importance of Pharmacologic Guideline Adherence.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current status, unique challenges, and future directions.Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
- Association Between Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Use and Outcome in Myocardial Infarction Patients With Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Effects of supervised exercise and dietary nitrate in older adults with controlled hypertension and/or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry · 2017Article
- Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current Challenges and Future Directions.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2017Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Older Adults.Heart failure clinics · 2017Review
- Second thoughts on the final rule: An analysis of baseline participant characteristics reports on ClinicalTrials.gov.PloS one · 2017Article
- Spironolactone for Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Whither to After TOPCAT?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2015Review
- Beta-blocker Use and 30-day All-cause Readmission in Medicare Beneficiaries with Systolic Heart Failure.The American journal of medicine · 2015Article
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the elderly: scope of the problem.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to examine the clinical effectiveness of aldosterone antagonists in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF).
backgroundAldosterone antagonists improve outcomes in HF and reduced EF. However, their role in HF-PEF remains unclear.
methodsOf the 10,570 hospitalized older (65 years of age) HF-PEF (EF 40%) patients in the Medicare-linked OPTIMIZE-HF(Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure) trial, 8,013 patients had no prior aldosterone antagonist use and no current contraindications; 492 (6% of these 8,013) patients received new prescriptions for aldosterone antagonists. We assembled a matched cohort of 487 pairs of patients receiving and not receiving aldosterone antagonists, who had a similar propensity to receive these drugs and were balanced on 116 baseline characteristics.
resultsPatients had a mean age of 80 years old, a mean EF of 54%, 59% were women, and 8% were African American. During 2.4 year of mean follow-up (through December 2008), the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization occurred in 392 (81%) and 393 (81%) patients receiving and not receiving aldosterone antagonists, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 1.11; p = 0.628). Aldosterone antagonists had no association with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.20; p = 0.693) or HF hospitalization (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.07; p = 0.188). Among 8013 prematched patients, multivariable-adjusted HR for the primary composite endpoint associated with aldosterone antagonist use was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.03; p = 0.144).
conclusionsIn older HF-PEF patients, aldosterone antagonists had no association with clinical outcomes. Findings from the ongoing randomized controlled TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial will provide further insights into their effect in HF-PEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.