Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23814440›Full record

ArticlePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2012

Plant regeneration in Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. et Fernand. from embryogenic callus and cell suspension culture and assessment of genetic fidelity of plants derived through somatic embryogenesis.

Mohd Zahid Rizvi, Arun Kumar Kukreja, Narendra Singh Bisht

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Induction of somatic embryogenesis in gum arabic tree [Acacia senegal (L.) Willd].Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohd Zahid RizviPlant Tissue Culture Division, Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (CIMAP), Lucknow, P.O. CIMAP-226015 Uttar Pradesh India ; Department of Botany, Shia Post Graduate College, Sitapur Road, Lucknow-226020, India.
Arun Kumar Kukreja
Narendra Singh Bisht

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient in vitro propagation of medicinally important endangered plant C. borivilianum has been achieved through somatic embryogenesis. Solid embryogenic medium [Murashige and Skoog medium containing 1.79 mM NH4NO3, 10.72 mM KNO3, 1.13 μM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 7.38 μM 2-isopentenyladenine and 0.76 mM proline] supplemented with polyethylene glycol and sucrose (3 % each), exhibited 1.88-fold increase in embryo maturation compared to embryogenic medium containing 3 % sucrose. Liquid embryogenic medium supported better somatic embryo production and maturation. Highest total (79) and mature (cotyledonary stage) somatic embryos (38) as well as highest germination (57.5 %) was observed at inoculum density of 0.4 g/40 ml of liquid medium. 5.86 pH level exhibited optimal growth, maturation and germination of somatic embryos. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis of C. borivilianum plants regenerated through somatic embryogenesis revealed that they were genetically similar to the mother plant. The protocol established in the present study can be used for rapid mass multiplication of C. borivilianum in bioreactor employing liquid medium.

Indexed as

Chlorophytum borivilianumGenetic fidelityMaturationPolyethylene glycolSomatic embryos

Identifiers

PMID23814440
PMCPMC3550513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.