ArticleJournal of vision2013
A Bayesian model of lightness perception that incorporates spatial variation in the illumination.
Article in Journal of vision, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep convolutional neural network trained for lightness constancy is susceptible to lightness illusions.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Deep neural networks trained for estimating reflectance and illumination achieve lightness constancy differently than human observers.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Exploring for gloss: Active exploration in visual material perception.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- What Fechner could not do: Separating perceptual encoding and decoding with difference scaling.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- The effects of distractors on brightness perception based on a spiking network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Equivalent noise characterization of human lightness constancy.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Simple Assumptions to Improve Markov Illuminance and Reflectance.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- A model of lightness perception guided by probabilistic assumptions about lighting and reflectance.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Influences of orientation on the Ponzo, contrast, and Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet illusions.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- Layer and framework theories of lightness.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2019Review
- Perception and Reality: Why a Wholly Empirical Paradigm is Needed to Understand Vision.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2015Article
- Will understanding vision require a wholly empirical paradigm?Frontiers in psychology · 2015Article
- Short-term memory affects color perception in context.PloS one · 2014Article
- A unified account of perceptual layering and surface appearance in terms of gamut relativity.PloS one · 2014Article
- Depth effect on lightness revisited: The role of articulation, proximity and fields of illumination.i-Perception · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lightness of a test stimulus depends in a complex manner on the context in which it is viewed. To predict lightness, it is necessary to leverage measurements of a feasible number of contextual configurations into predictions for a wider range of configurations. Here we pursue this goal, using the idea that lightness results from the visual system's attempt to provide stable information about object surface reflectance. We develop a Bayesian algorithm that estimates both illumination and reflectance from image luminance, and link perceived lightness to the algorithm's estimates of surface reflectance. The algorithm resolves ambiguity in the image through the application of priors that specify what illumination and surface reflectances are likely to occur in viewed scenes. The prior distributions were chosen to allow spatial variation in both illumination and surface reflectance. To evaluate our model, we compared its predictions to a data set of judgments of perceived lightness of test patches embedded in achromatic checkerboards (Allred, Radonjić, Gilchrist, & Brainard, 2012). The checkerboard stimuli incorporated the large variation in luminance that is a pervasive feature of natural scenes. In addition, the luminance profile of the checks both near to and remote from the central test patches was systematically manipulated. The manipulations provided a simplified version of spatial variation in illumination. The model can account for effects of overall changes in image luminance and the dependence of such changes on spatial location as well as some but not all of the more detailed features of the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.