Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23813920›Full record

ArticleJournal of morphology2013

Embryological staging of the Zebra Finch, Taeniopygia guttata.

Jessica R Murray, Claire W Varian-Ramos, Zoe S Welch, Margaret S Saha

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of morphology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Geometry and dynamics link form, function, and evolution of finch beaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica R MurrayBiology Department, College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, Virginia, 23187.
Claire W Varian-Ramos
Zoe S Welch
Margaret S Saha
William & Mary · USWilliams (United States) · US

Funding

Plasticity and Regulation in Xenopus Anterior-Posterior PatterningR15HD077624 · NICHD · COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY · PI SAHA, MARGARET S · 2013 to 2013
$368k
Neurotransmitter Fate Specification and the Role of Voltage-Gated Calcium ChannelR15NS067566 · NINDS · COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY · PI SAHA, MARGARET S · 2009 to 2009
$213k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS R15 HD077624NINDS NIH HHS R15NS067566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebra Finches (Taeniopygia guttata) are the most commonly used laboratory songbird species, yet their embryological development has been poorly characterized. Most studies to date apply Hamburger and Hamilton stages derived from chicken development; however, significant differences in development between precocial and altricial species suggest that they may not be directly comparable. We provide the first detailed description of embryological development in the Zebra Finch under standard artificial incubation. These descriptions confirm that some of the features used to classify chicken embryos into stages are not applicable in an altricial bird such as the Zebra Finch. This staging protocol will help to standardize future studies of embryological development in the Zebra Finch.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentAnimalsChick EmbryoChickensFinchesartificial incubationembryological developmentpasserine birdstagingZebra Finch

Identifiers

PMID23813920
PMCPMC4239009
OpenAlexW1847753680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.