Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23813737›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2013

The direct inhibitory effect of dutasteride or finasteride on androgen receptor activity is cell line specific.

Rishi Raj Chhipa, Danny Halim, Jinrong Cheng, Huan Yi Zhang, James L Mohler, Clement Ip, Yue Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Abiraterone treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer selects for progesterone responsive mutant androgen receptors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Rishi Raj ChhipaDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Danny Halim
Jinrong Cheng
Huan Yi Zhang
James L Mohler
Clement Ip
Yue Wu
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Tumor stem cells in androgen independent prostate cancerP01CA077739 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MOHLER, JAMES L · 1998 to 2014
$16.8M
Translational Research of Finasteride and Selenium Prevention of Prostate CancerP01CA126804 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI IP, CLEMENT C · 2007 to 2011
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA077739NCI NIH HHS P01 CA126804NCI NIH HHS P01CA126804NCI NIH HHS P01CA77739NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P30CA16056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinasteride and dutasteride were developed originally as 5α-reductase inhibitors to block the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). These drugs may possess off-target effects on the androgen receptor (AR) due to their structural similarity to DHT.

methodsA total of four human prostate cancer cell models were examined: LNCaP (T877A mutant AR), 22Rv1 (H874Y mutant AR), LAPC4 (wild-type AR), and VCaP (wild-type AR). Cells were cultured in 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum, either with or without DHT added to the medium. AR activity was evaluated using the ARE-luciferase assay or the expression of AR regulated genes.

resultsDutasteride was more potent than finasteride in interfering with DHT-stimulated AR signaling. Disruption of AR function was accompanied by decreased cell growth. Cells that rely on DHT for protection against death were particularly vulnerable to dutasteride. Different prostate cancer cell models exhibited different sensitivities to dutasteride and finasteride. LNCaP was most sensitive, LAPC4 and VCaP were intermediate, while 22Rv1 was least sensitive. Regardless of the AR genotype, if AR was transfected into drug-sensitive cells, AR was inhibited by drug treatment; and if AR was transfected into drug-resistant cells, AR was not inhibited.

conclusionsThe direct inhibitory effect of dutasteride or finasteride on AR signaling is cell line specific. Mutations in the ligand binding domain of AR do not appear to play a significant role in influencing the AR antagonistic effect of these drugs. Subcellular constituent is an important factor in determining the drug effect on AR function.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic Neoplasms5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAnimalsAzasteroidsCattleCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDihydrotestosteroneDutasterideFinasterideGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleReceptors, Androgen5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAR protein, humanAzasteroidsDihydrotestosteroneDutasterideFinasterideReceptors, Androgenandrogen receptor signalingantiandrogendutasteridefinasterideprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID23813737
PMCPMC3992475
OpenAlexW1510720401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.