Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Psychotherapeutic approaches: hopefully, globally effective.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024
   Article
2. Genomic Diagnosis of Rare Pediatric Disease in the United Kingdom and Ireland.The New England journal of medicine · 2023
   Article
3. Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.Human genomics · 2018
   Article
4. Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2017
   Article
5. Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015
   Article
6. Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data.Lancet (London, England) · 2015
   Article
7. Finding people who will tell you their thoughts on genomics-recruitment strategies for social sciences research.Journal of community genetics · 2014
   Article
8. Exome Sequencing in Fetuses with Structural Malformations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2014
   Review
9. Online questionnaire development: using film to engage participants and then gather attitudes towards the sharing of genomic data.Social science research · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as